Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, legion@kernel.org,
	kees@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
	atomlin@atomlin.com, rppt@kernel.org, jani.nikula@intel.com,
	hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	tglx@kernel.org, nsc@kernel.org, alexandre.chartre@oracle.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, dianders@chromium.org, bp@alien8.de,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, jaredwhite@microsoft.com,
	johan@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, seanjc@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	vdonnefort@google.com, tarunsahu@google.com, gshan@redhat.com,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	xur@google.com, djbw@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
	nogikh@google.com, sumitg@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zengheng4@huawei.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, corbet@lwn.net, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, zhangpengjie2@huawei.com,
	x86@kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com, jic23@kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, petr.pavlu@suse.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	pratyush@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
	maz@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, jgross@suse.com,
	seiden@linux.ibm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, song@kernel.org,
	nathan@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, graf@amazon.com,
	chao.gao@intel.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	sidnayyar@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	vladimir.murzin@arm.com, kas@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 21/46] selftests: liveupdate: Add physical CPU preservation unit tests
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 15:36:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920193650.3373435-22-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920193650.3373435-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Add unit tests exercising CPU preservation sysfs interface:
- Verify /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu<N>/preserve operations.
- Test CPU offline and preserve sequencing.
- Verify status reporting and error handling.

Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config     |   6 +
 .../testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 257 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
index 016d009dba13..9458b9c70eeb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/config
@@ -5,8 +5,14 @@ CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER=y
 CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y
 CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUGFS=y
 CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUG=y
+CONFIG_SMP=y
+CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
 CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=y
 CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST=y
+CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_CPU=y
+CONFIG_ACPI=y
+CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
+CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
 CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE=y
 CONFIG_TMPFS=y
 CONFIG_SHMEM=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
index 2dedd5fc2534..b3c9cd7ea653 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
@@ -530,4 +530,255 @@ TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_files)
 	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
 }
 
+static int find_hotplug_cpu(void)
+{
+	char path[128];
+	int cpu;
+
+	for (cpu = 1; cpu < 256; cpu++) {
+		snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", cpu);
+		if (access(path, R_OK) == 0) {
+			snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online", cpu);
+			if (access(path, R_OK) == 0)
+				return cpu;
+		}
+	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static int read_cpu_online(int cpu)
+{
+	char path[128], buf[16];
+	int fd, val;
+
+	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online", cpu);
+	fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return -1;
+	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+	if (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1) <= 0) {
+		close(fd);
+		return -1;
+	}
+	close(fd);
+	val = atoi(buf);
+	return val;
+}
+
+static int write_cpu_online(int cpu, int val)
+{
+	char path[128], buf[16];
+	int fd, ret;
+
+	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online", cpu);
+	fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return -errno;
+	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d\n", val);
+	ret = write(fd, buf, strlen(buf));
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		ret = -errno;
+		close(fd);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	close(fd);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test Case: CPU Preservation Basic
+ *
+ * Verifies that a CPU preserve sysfs file descriptor can be preserved in a
+ * LUO session, offlining the CPU from scheduler and returning it online upon
+ * session teardown.
+ */
+TEST_F(liveupdate_device, cpu_preserve_basic)
+{
+	char path[128];
+	int target_cpu;
+	int session_fd, cpu_fd;
+
+	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
+	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
+		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
+	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
+
+	target_cpu = find_hotplug_cpu();
+	if (target_cpu < 0)
+		SKIP(return, "No hotpluggable CPU with preserve attribute found");
+
+	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", target_cpu);
+	cpu_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd, 0);
+
+	session_fd = luo_create_session(self->fd1, "cpu-preserve-test");
+	ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd, cpu_fd, 0x42), 0);
+	close(cpu_fd);
+
+	/* Verify target CPU is now offline */
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 0);
+
+	/* Closing session unpreserves and brings CPU back online */
+	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test Case: CPU Preservation Sysfs Online/Offline Rejection
+ *
+ * Verifies that while a CPU is preserved, attempting to bring it online
+ * via sysfs fails with -EBUSY. After session closure, normal online/offline
+ * hotplug operations succeed.
+ */
+TEST_F(liveupdate_device, cpu_preserve_sysfs_online_offline)
+{
+	char path[128];
+	int target_cpu;
+	int session_fd, cpu_fd;
+
+	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
+	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
+		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
+	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
+
+	target_cpu = find_hotplug_cpu();
+	if (target_cpu < 0)
+		SKIP(return, "No hotpluggable CPU with preserve attribute found");
+
+	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", target_cpu);
+	cpu_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd, 0);
+
+	session_fd = luo_create_session(self->fd1, "cpu-preserve-sysfs");
+	ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd, cpu_fd, 0x100), 0);
+	close(cpu_fd);
+
+	/* Target CPU is offline while preserved */
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 0);
+
+	/* Attempting to bring the preserved CPU online via sysfs must fail with EBUSY */
+	EXPECT_EQ(write_cpu_online(target_cpu, 1), -EBUSY);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 0);
+
+	/* Writing 0 to online (offline) should succeed since it is already offline */
+	EXPECT_EQ(write_cpu_online(target_cpu, 0), 0);
+
+	/* Close session -> unpreserve and restore online */
+	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 1);
+
+	/* Verify normal offline and online now succeed */
+	ASSERT_EQ(write_cpu_online(target_cpu, 0), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(write_cpu_online(target_cpu, 1), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test Case: Prevent Double CPU Preservation
+ *
+ * Verifies that a CPU cannot be preserved twice across the same or different
+ * sessions simultaneously.
+ */
+TEST_F(liveupdate_device, cpu_preserve_prevent_double)
+{
+	char path[128];
+	int target_cpu;
+	int session_fd1, session_fd2, cpu_fd1, cpu_fd2;
+
+	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
+	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
+		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
+	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
+
+	target_cpu = find_hotplug_cpu();
+	if (target_cpu < 0)
+		SKIP(return, "No hotpluggable CPU with preserve attribute found");
+
+	session_fd1 = luo_create_session(self->fd1, "cpu-double-1");
+	ASSERT_GE(session_fd1, 0);
+	session_fd2 = luo_create_session(self->fd1, "cpu-double-2");
+	ASSERT_GE(session_fd2, 0);
+
+	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", target_cpu);
+	cpu_fd1 = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd1, 0);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd1, cpu_fd1, 0x10), 0);
+	close(cpu_fd1);
+
+	/* Attempting to preserve the same CPU in session2 must fail with -EBUSY */
+	cpu_fd2 = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd2, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd2, cpu_fd2, 0x20), -EBUSY);
+	close(cpu_fd2);
+
+	/* Attempting to preserve again in session1 must also fail with -EBUSY */
+	cpu_fd2 = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd2, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd1, cpu_fd2, 0x30), -EBUSY);
+	close(cpu_fd2);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd1), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd2), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpu), 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test Case: Multiple Preserved CPUs
+ *
+ * Verifies preserving multiple distinct CPUs simultaneously in the same session.
+ */
+TEST_F(liveupdate_device, cpu_preserve_multiple_cpus)
+{
+	char path[128];
+	int target_cpus[8];
+	int num_targets = 0;
+	int session_fd, cpu_fd, cpu, i;
+
+	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
+	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
+		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
+	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
+
+	for (cpu = 1; cpu < 256 && num_targets < 8; cpu++) {
+		snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", cpu);
+		if (access(path, R_OK) == 0) {
+			snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online", cpu);
+			if (access(path, R_OK) == 0)
+				target_cpus[num_targets++] = cpu;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (num_targets < 2)
+		SKIP(return, "Need at least 2 hotpluggable CPUs for multiple CPU preserve test");
+
+	session_fd = luo_create_session(self->fd1, "multi-cpu-preserve");
+	ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++) {
+		snprintf(path, sizeof(path),
+			 "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/preserve", target_cpus[i]);
+		cpu_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+		ASSERT_GE(cpu_fd, 0);
+		ASSERT_EQ(luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd, cpu_fd, 0x1000 + i), 0);
+		close(cpu_fd);
+	}
+
+	/* Verify all targets are offline and reject sysfs online */
+	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++) {
+		ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpus[i]), 0);
+		EXPECT_EQ(write_cpu_online(target_cpus[i], 1), -EBUSY);
+	}
+
+	/* Close session and verify all targets return online */
+	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
+	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++)
+		ASSERT_EQ(read_cpu_online(target_cpus[i]), 1);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.55.0.1082.g2b9226bbc0-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-20 19:36 [RFC PATCH 00/46] Orphaned Virtual Machines Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 01/46] KVM: luo: Delegate VM creation type to kvm_arch_vm_luo_preserve Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 02/46] KVM: arm64: Split demux_c15_{get,set}_val from userspace accessors Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 03/46] KVM: arm64: Split kvm_sys_reg_{get,set}_user from kernel accessors Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 04/46] x86/mm/ident_map: Add force_pte to support 4K PTE identity mappings Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/46] arm64: mm: Add trans_pgd_map_range() support Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/46] x86/smp: Skip offline CPUs for REBOOT_VECTOR in native_stop_other_cpus() Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/46] KVM: luo: Support vCPU file preservation across live updates Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/46] KVM: x86: Add x86 vCPU LUO preservation ABI and register helpers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/46] KVM: x86: Implement architectural vCPU state preservation via LUO Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/46] KVM: arm64: " Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 11/46] liveupdate: Define CPU preservation linker sections Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 12/46] liveupdate: Add liveupdate_session_name() helper Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 13/46] cpu_preserve: Add physical CPU preservation ABI and core API headers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 14/46] cpu_preserve: Add core physical CPU preservation state and park loop Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 15/46] cpu_preserve: Add physical CPU preservation lifecycle and build rules Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 16/46] liveupdate: cpu_preserve: Add sysfs interface Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 17/46] liveupdate: cpu_preserve: Add isolated address space management API Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 18/46] liveupdate: cpu_preserve: Add LUO file handler for preserved physical CPUs Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 19/46] x86: liveupdate: Add low-level physical CPU preservation assembly Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 20/46] x86: liveupdate: Add physical CPU preservation context and page table support Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 22/46] selftests: liveupdate: Add physical CPU preservation live update tests Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 23/46] Documentation: liveupdate: Add physical CPU preservation documentation Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 24/46] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for KVM Caretaker Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 25/46] arm64: liveupdate: Add support for physical CPU preservation Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 26/46] oncore: Add on-core KHO ABI and public framework headers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 27/46] oncore: Implement on-core session lifecycle and scheduling loop Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 28/46] KVM: caretaker: Add Caretaker control block and architecture ops headers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 29/46] KVM: caretaker: Implement Caretaker session memory mapping helpers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 30/46] KVM: caretaker: Integrate Caretaker vCPU detach, attach, and cancel with KVM Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 31/46] KVM: caretaker: Add generic KHO ABI telemetry and debugfs reporting Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 32/46] KVM: x86: Add TDP MMU KHO preservation helpers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 33/46] KVM: x86: Add Caretaker x86 KHO ABI and runtime context headers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 34/46] KVM: x86: Implement Caretaker LAPIC timer and interrupt injection Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 35/46] KVM: x86: Implement Caretaker VM-exit dispatch and instruction decoders Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 36/46] KVM: x86: Implement Caretaker run loop and LUO detach/attach lifecycle Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 37/46] KVM: VMX: Add Caretaker VMX assembly guest entry/exit routine and helpers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 38/46] KVM: VMX: Implement Caretaker VMX VMCS lifecycle and exit dispatch Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-20 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH 39/46] KVM: VMX: Integrate Caretaker VMX detach serialization and KVM registration Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH 00/46] Orphaned Virtual Machines Graf (AWS), Alexander
2026-09-21 21:00 ` [RFC PATCH 39/46] KVM: VMX: Integrate Caretaker VMX detach serialization and KVM registration Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 40/46] KVM: SVM: Add Caretaker SVM assembly guest entry/exit routine Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 41/46] KVM: SVM: Implement Caretaker SVM VMCB lifecycle and exit dispatch Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 42/46] KVM: arm64: Add Caretaker arm64 KHO ABI and runtime context headers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 43/46] KVM: arm64: Add Caretaker EL2 exception vectors and guest entry/exit assembly Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 44/46] KVM: arm64: Implement Caretaker GICv3 CPU interface and arch timer emulation Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 45/46] KVM: arm64: Implement Caretaker system register trap and exception handlers Pasha Tatashin
2026-09-21 21:00   ` [RFC PATCH 46/46] KVM: arm64: Implement Caretaker vCPU run loop and LUO detach/attach lifecycle Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260920193650.3373435-22-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jaredwhite@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nogikh@google.com \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sidnayyar@google.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xur@google.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangpengjie2@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox