From: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests: drv-net: psp: test that rx-assoc fails on closed and listen socks
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:46:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930-psp-defeat-v2-4-f266e7447129@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-psp-defeat-v2-0-f266e7447129@gmail.com>
Cover two of the basic psp assoc states that have been defeatured. Do
not include tests with shutdown(), connect(..., AF_UNSPEC), etc. I don't
think the coverage is worth the complexity. That should be done with
packetdrill.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- drop assoc_tx_non_established test
---
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
index 0a2329f41431..473500901879 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
@@ -319,6 +319,32 @@ def assoc_sk_only_unconn(cfg):
ksft_eq(the_exception.nl_msg.error, -errno.EINVAL)
+def assoc_rx_unconnected(cfg):
+ """ Test that an Rx assoc is rejected on an unconnected socket """
+ _init_psp_dev(cfg)
+
+ with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET6, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as s:
+ with ksft_raises(NlError) as cm:
+ cfg.pspnl.rx_assoc({"version": 0,
+ "dev-id": cfg.psp_dev_id,
+ "sock-fd": s.fileno()})
+ ksft_eq(cm.exception.nl_msg.error, -errno.ENOTCONN)
+ ksft_eq(cm.exception.nl_msg.extack['bad-attr'], ".sock-fd")
+
+
+def assoc_rx_listener(cfg):
+ """ Test that an Rx assoc is rejected on a listening socket """
+ _init_psp_dev(cfg)
+
+ with socket.create_server(("localhost", 0)) as s:
+ with ksft_raises(NlError) as cm:
+ cfg.pspnl.rx_assoc({"version": 0,
+ "dev-id": cfg.psp_dev_id,
+ "sock-fd": s.fileno()})
+ ksft_eq(cm.exception.nl_msg.error, -errno.ENOTCONN)
+ ksft_eq(cm.exception.nl_msg.extack['bad-attr'], ".sock-fd")
+
+
def assoc_version_mismatch(cfg):
""" Test creating associations where Rx and Tx PSP versions do not match """
_init_psp_dev(cfg)
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 23:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: psp: require an established connection for association setup Daniel Zahka
2026-09-30 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests: drv-net: psp: swap closed for connected sockets in assoc tests Daniel Zahka
2026-10-02 0:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: psp: require an established connection for association setup Daniel Zahka
2026-10-02 0:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-02 9:18 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-10-02 2:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-02 15:42 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-09-30 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: psp: drop psp assoc clear in sk_clone() Daniel Zahka
2026-10-02 0:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 23:46 ` Daniel Zahka [this message]
2026-10-02 0:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests: drv-net: psp: test that rx-assoc fails on closed and listen socks Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: psp: require an established connection for association setup netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-01 15:05 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-10-05 23:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930-psp-defeat-v2-4-f266e7447129@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox