From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12144217F27; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791897178; cv=none; b=jKHDJW6M/V0yJm4XV6zHk4ECSnd7Y3/Rzm5/oj3XGUdhntXjY8MUKT/gqP+ow8VCuClIbNEGc1dBzI25vYkgzSfF7LdIgdkSL7/y6Do/JjM51WxcWs2V3TaxP/NWWJJziWPbaWMZdX+0J7ptAwiCi0aOiD1+2zWPk4bIX3G+OPI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791897178; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1RcIksfKLLcVcMYCc4re/xaG6ukSz9/3jXmI99fHVGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Xkdw3egQPRqu/3iuQKeEx/d05iLgskcTQIFQAtG8ztwjc3v5Qh0whJ1fC3WKoSqvir6ewd+xVpaNWjTppefAjPjLndmjnncsyXgP6H16y4PnfSb8rmTNApmB0NJE60Awkh4XYXwE59f9CHM4ooJySwjspuWyoACm+0MlHbG5AYA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=H/YSs450; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="H/YSs450" Received: from killaraus.ideasonboard.com (unknown [185.104.138.147]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7579C230; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:10:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1791897053; bh=1RcIksfKLLcVcMYCc4re/xaG6ukSz9/3jXmI99fHVGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H/YSs450+AU6bCz7muMQncdn7G5ulSa//iGMsZahJBeki3yQFTCT6D8Llo/LATWd+ NErf9vtKFJthvQUsrUJLuMLZKWvdkRG/pmJoRj07hvsLMEqGcba3PL3HJO8wXRwjwn lAKiWga03WGZfMrIy223AGKRV3JSrBgat4Gq/zMI= Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:12:43 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sasha Levin , corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , Justin Stitt , Carlos Maiolino , Jakub Kicinski , Jori Koolstra , Brian Foster , Christoph Hellwig , David Disseldorp , Mark Brown , Jani Nikula , Jens Axboe , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Vlastimil Babka , "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: remove Assisted-by references Message-ID: <20261013131243.GM56180@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> References: <20261009083137.3-1-sashal@kernel.org> <0914a106-bacf-4d95-854a-bfeefbff62a4@kernel.org> <20261013123132.GC4214@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:59:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > The tag's useful for push back on review, > > > > That's the point I raised during the maintainer summit. It's actually > > the *absence* of a tag that helps me push back on review. It allows me > > to ask submitters if they forgot to add the tag, and in many cases (so > > far) they simply don't reply. > > While the tag's useful for pushback, pushing back is the issue. > > The asymmetry between submitter volume/reviewer bandwidth is the MOST > CRITICAL issue we face. > > If reviewers are required to reply to all of these people, the project's > dead, AFAIC. > > Ignoring is the only workable long-term solution. How do you decide which patches to ignore ? > The issue we had before was a lack of a CLEAR and LOUD 'yes ignore these > people' from Linus. > > We now have that :) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart