From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C750E282F34 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792025606; cv=none; b=OABVy/WCRWFVCNv3Bpcu/abHWx0zMOZxMuc3OI4iQW4G1ISXFDrlKWbSliO2jAINsqKNvKpLhJ9HgiiPV88RXmWWJe+riTmbn0O86m7BsLuVjI/ecA3MQZ0m4x33fbBOn0m5y6RUOjO00PxdNISTcxN+5YMuJf7SN/RMvSgMH5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792025606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a8W4R8N2Yi0O8FvasCemaSpedschVfQtJkWTvtZgMGg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=bPWBchQhqGKEnSsBXnSxpFNQM+ze0erhP5YKI1IID5tfB017jJ2nG8VwHMdVofkJ9heszFH7F3sawYoRs1dacgXgp8LkRJ1hK3cVOM4YJ0Hcs93iIJUpyXQkepFwx9LSQe+4pn4youshfk71x50h3VhWYJyT3RGyrVoJ14ywQMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Dh789iPk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Dh789iPk" Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48df3912dd2so43691f8f.1 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:53:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792025603; x=1792630403; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=IUyEEtX7OMRFle7IW+soIgHuWHTH1MKpFrWXShCimnU=; b=Dh789iPkA2v+Kvbl6GvvN5bnswe05umOMJBKQw9ChdSusk8tV8F8WLTLFl7dpINoQt V087YXfESZNYg7KgVF7azhekSLaaWFTuNXytKRBVXtVi414Ae6NNv2rJqvyK0Wo59L7+ z6koyzxMFH18hYgnP5N5az6N2V0jOUSPxz/1IDGr91B3qomFSePSJitQbUhfhf58LDSp 8i1ls2/EyAjb6oz5j7zmK18Gh7bnMKkOzbGlm6Fm0DpNrirjjWsPH3mxBRhi9jttJ4F3 OKc6jro/jhhmP8XUZSOyPDDYAeg3216zJE5ILrMHMJJz442zyuLDzx0fkG138yY46qwb kZZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792025603; x=1792630403; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=IUyEEtX7OMRFle7IW+soIgHuWHTH1MKpFrWXShCimnU=; b=gir9s1Uf5nqlIr8GDTtxNl7Z/8BsLS9tSCCs4KYDfcsoXQXDiwA9xBhwa5JhrQ0GpG M0zhZsjrO5LPrCqr3MDszhpGIwdHr6L20XqilEnSQ+LqMLkEkGnTBCzVlQ+tKV322//g TGZ8ayFKdooLDQcPKaDISvs8Th6CR+5sxaQV8AhZ/pFhfj2kbZvltwFPOBzDmeIyk4Ax KL41Cdo4/riF1j+HIpwn3v9WgGXpR61C7IbfP0mpJnvBBPfpkD6TQ6mtZ72wzELMuL/H VlEudSZxna1D9z39tFydSzGfprSGiqEbrS78jhOZmKdbnLXtpsjR8sDnptddqGY30qIx eK8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYKHmUZ4lhvuY2SMdHMqYb80Z4jLiGDVWfuW8bRKaJZqB+gfeCGl P70J6ciougl20xShXsY7qPFo5GxDhPUeuthAk8qoyb1FWtak4KuM2/CE X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou344ZufDeYbB8TrWew8J6P1X04WeKmJfowauy8CFh9N4krGROo600yA6Pd/ffa zVgNRTkkfKCzgA8WEio7vq3whLJ0XVu3Vm3RgXQlaOsk+sCa8tZZJfO2ocYuvjUw4G7WWAKm0I5 xyG6e/yk5rOkDUXbcVHkEY4nVg2T37LbOIojja9ZsDlKNecXRZp8qShhWznHrSrHTnrpARNJMZ0 3EkOH2jXJ7cn+TpWl5jF+qtDmSbqvCyVbL8o7naCJhTAepO7fLTn0suJq9xbD6A9JZPyLJ2h+KN 07SVWnW7Y4mdWU6f0H//7s7BMZaGBocE8ebcrlaxVE13zUILSqdP4pR0i1g8YonPamxOnuGbpos AllvyqgWmNGsRJEQ1E2qqb5xt70eux7I2/D9NsZnTvirO5lnPGvqm1Nv589gUK8xXMCeXIEUtYR MyuCIB2tspfKMvBAhikkxOuuc2lS3g+hBcXrQIxxGuV/Tk9Cb4geE4bk5JB+KMymjoz3nljosHr rFMmKEUnPXTTqn1Qe8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4106:b0:48d:f14a:9186 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48df14a92e3mr3433584f8f.6.1792025602873; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Nuel20.localdomain ([105.118.9.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-48de0ab5262sm14895048f8f.22.2026.10.14.17.53.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Omokefe Emmanuel Onanaroghene To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, mchehab@kernel.org, aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, emmaonana18@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: kdoc: strip DOMAIN_NS() wrapper in function prototypes Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:53:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20261015005314.7195-1-emmaonana18@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20261014224714.16922-1-emmaonana18@gmail.com> References: <20261014224714.16922-1-emmaonana18@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:22:02 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Neither of these patches applies to docs-next...what did you base them >> on? > > Hi Jon, > > I had mistakenly based both patches on mainline rather than docs-next. > I have rebased both on top of docs-next and sent a v2 for each: > > - docs: kdoc: handle TRACE_EVENT_FN() family in tracepoint parser: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261014223134.14772-1-emmaonana18@gmail.com/ > > - docs: kdoc: strip DOMAIN_NS() wrapper in function prototypes: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261014223437.16164-1-emmaonana18@gmail.com/ > I just noticed another mistake on my part, because I prepared the two v2 patches on separate independent branches off docs-next, both patches add their regression test at the exact same location in tools/unittests/test_kdoc_parser.py (line 444). Applying them sequentially will cause a merge conflict I didn't realize that patches modifying the exact same context in a file should be stacked sequentially on a single branch as a patch series rather than developed on separate branches. Should I respin them as a 2-patch series against docs-next, or would you prefer to resolve when applying? Thanks, Omokefe