linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	rppt@kernel.org, xiaqinxin@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] iommu: Add calls for IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:33:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20e015d7-cb54-4a2a-bf62-a828e10e3126@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251211125928.3258905-3-smostafa@google.com>

On 12/11/25 20:59, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Add calls for the new iommu debug config IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC:
> - iommu_debug_init: Enable the debug mode if configured by the user.
> - iommu_debug_map: Track iommu pages mapped, using physical address.
> - iommu_debug_unmap_begin: Track start of iommu unmap operation, with
>    IOVA and size.
> - iommu_debug_unmap_end: Track the end of unmap operation, passing the
>    actual unmapped size versus the tracked one at unmap_begin.
> 
> We have to do the unmap_begin/end as once pages are unmapped we lose
> the information of the physical address.
> This is racy, but the API is racy by construction as it uses refcounts
> and doesn't attempt to lock/synchronize with the IOMMU API as that will
> be costly, meaning that possibility of false negative exists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c | 28 +++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h            | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c                 | 11 ++++-
>   include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> index 4022e9af7f27..1d343421da98 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> @@ -5,11 +5,15 @@
>    * IOMMU API debug page alloc sanitizer
>    */
>   #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>   #include <linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>   #include <linux/page_ext.h>
>   
> +#include "iommu-priv.h"
> +
>   static bool needed;
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_debug_initialized);
>   
>   struct iommu_debug_metadata {
>   	atomic_t ref;
> @@ -25,6 +29,30 @@ struct page_ext_operations page_iommu_debug_ops = {
>   	.need = need_iommu_debug,
>   };
>   
> +void __iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			       unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			     unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> +			     size_t unmapped)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void iommu_debug_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (!needed)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pr_info("iommu: Debugging page allocations, expect overhead or disable iommu.debug_pagealloc");
> +	static_branch_enable(&iommu_debug_initialized);
> +}
> +
>   static int __init iommu_debug_pagealloc(char *str)
>   {
>   	return kstrtobool(str, &needed);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> index c95394cd03a7..aaffad5854fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>   #define __LINUX_IOMMU_PRIV_H
>   
>   #include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h>
>   #include <linux/msi.h>
>   
>   static inline const struct iommu_ops *dev_iommu_ops(struct device *dev)
> @@ -65,4 +66,61 @@ static inline int iommufd_sw_msi(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   			       struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid,
>   			       struct iommu_attach_handle *handle);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> +
> +void __iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, phys_addr_t phys,
> +		       size_t size);
> +void __iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			       unsigned long iova, size_t size);
> +void __iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			     unsigned long iova, size_t size, size_t unmapped);
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				   phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> +		__iommu_debug_map(domain, phys, size);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					   unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> +		__iommu_debug_unmap_begin(domain, iova, size);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					 unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> +					 size_t unmapped)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> +		__iommu_debug_unmap_end(domain, iova, size, unmapped);
> +}

I am wondering whether it would be better if we move iommu_debug_map()
to iommu-debug-pagealloc.c,

void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
		     phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
{
	if (static_branch_likely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
		__iommu_debug_map(domain, phys, size);
}

(Does it make sense to use static_branch_likely() here? Normally, people
  who enable CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC would want to use this
  debugging feature. Or not?)

So that ...

> +
> +void iommu_debug_init(void);
> +
> +#else
> +static inline void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				   phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					   unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					 unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> +					 size_t unmapped)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_debug_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */
> +
>   #endif /* __LINUX_IOMMU_PRIV_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 2ca990dfbb88..01b062575519 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ static int __init iommu_subsys_init(void)
>   	if (!nb)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> +	iommu_debug_init();
> +
>   	for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iommu_buses); i++) {
>   		nb[i].notifier_call = iommu_bus_notifier;
>   		bus_register_notifier(iommu_buses[i], &nb[i]);
> @@ -2562,10 +2564,12 @@ int iommu_map_nosync(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   	}
>   
>   	/* unroll mapping in case something went wrong */
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
>   		iommu_unmap(domain, orig_iova, orig_size - size);
> -	else
> +	} else {
>   		trace_map(orig_iova, orig_paddr, orig_size);
> +		iommu_debug_map(domain, orig_paddr, orig_size);
> +	}
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
> @@ -2627,6 +2631,8 @@ static size_t __iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   
>   	pr_debug("unmap this: iova 0x%lx size 0x%zx\n", iova, size);
>   
> +	iommu_debug_unmap_begin(domain, iova, size);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Keep iterating until we either unmap 'size' bytes (or more)
>   	 * or we hit an area that isn't mapped.
> @@ -2647,6 +2653,7 @@ static size_t __iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   	}
>   
>   	trace_unmap(orig_iova, size, unmapped);
> +	iommu_debug_unmap_end(domain, orig_iova, size, unmapped);
>   	return unmapped;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h b/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> index 83e64d70bf6c..a439d6815ca1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   #define __LINUX_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_H
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_debug_initialized);

... we could make this static?

>   
>   extern struct page_ext_operations page_iommu_debug_ops;
>   

Thanks,
baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-12  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-11 12:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] iommu: Add IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC sanitizer Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] iommu: Add page_ext for IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12  2:17   ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-12 18:37     ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] iommu: Add calls " Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12  2:33   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-12-12 18:44     ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] iommu: debug-pagealloc: Track IOMMU pages Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12  2:45   ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] iommu: debug-pagealloc: Check mapped/unmapped kernel memory Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12  2:51   ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-12 18:47     ` Mostafa Saleh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20e015d7-cb54-4a2a-bf62-a828e10e3126@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaqinxin@huawei.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).