From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="AuR9K+Om" Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B48BD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 13:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7b714a7835cso25812639f.0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 13:53:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1702331594; x=1702936394; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J8wlwZcZfMgu62MtPSRryzCZiPJUNxKIn0JHd17fo+8=; b=AuR9K+OmK3pUMtfDOPyYrKwqdhWPMvvVZeQAUv+8aos5dhTET8drE5mNAq5oafmI7Q tUIUnfRcgVgIDf7Z34vuQoExUCHnaHiOPQN3BvJBzehmSMbyaAQzoGn1PQtozu/n1knW 0p9uWSTG79ePkskxijzFyMgR06Kd5uHbYURaY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702331594; x=1702936394; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J8wlwZcZfMgu62MtPSRryzCZiPJUNxKIn0JHd17fo+8=; b=pfVlItPIsxoh6Wh+3GADGiRXz1epGu6tTiSNFCqIbp8omDS1f+mFA83tZAv7zKb6Ln ljTUQgaz+o0d2iKfBOm8Wol7BE6HD8hfZRBQnzaRnlNznFojL5reb2p2bcD83J0tJ2m/ 4EpAXXK66qNLjDwT3qXiXp7s5Lrc5Ool/IZ7FSWqr2bEeTExBh7tpa9At8s6oflBFkq3 DdhCOwXM8E2v/6xOxhE2ATicY2n//HeXTnQ+FG5kywqoIa3PZbAi00OAGHgD3dJ/f7EQ dpjRUfR8pGLKZIO2km9/xoPJpKxdRjJGL2sF7XE+VyRwGiR5UNrGnwIX+1QzqOopD7Zq 0byA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy6mnnbhUTCvd+0Ibb5YHRiqYyRRUDzlrXFWjmRTeN8na3zb8ug g06EI4GvuSvDjyD7wPbpkgCPcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHNXh53GeHIlmc9hQAoat+3wIYtfi4KMP437MU2mSbCYlghZVBb1fXt14Cen9PPHEHBoFg9Vg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c994:0:b0:7b7:365:924b with SMTP id z142-20020a6bc994000000b007b70365924bmr8423593iof.2.1702331594020; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 13:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([38.175.170.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m35-20020a056638272300b0046926891d83sm2087680jav.103.2023.12.11.13.53.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 13:53:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2498bf91-8057-43e8-98f2-4ed93c53ce9f@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:53:12 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall Content-Language: en-US To: Miroslav Benes Cc: mpdesouza@suse.com, Marcos Paulo de Souza , Shuah Khan , Jonathan Corbet , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Petr Mladek , Joe Lawrence , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan References: <20231031-send-lp-kselftests-v3-0-2b1655c2605f@suse.com> <20231031-send-lp-kselftests-v3-3-2b1655c2605f@suse.com> <8b95b96c-6aeb-4bf0-8ee9-2ba62330c672@linuxfoundation.org> <12a9ec1bc84dc6d4b461e5c780ba7d3c3aa91740.camel@suse.com> <76c4b967-1cb6-4f77-9402-f835b15adb10@linuxfoundation.org> From: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >> >>> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has >>> style problems, please review. >>> >>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >>> >>> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script >>> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your >>> output? >>> >>> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's >>> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. >>> >> >> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on >> whether or not you would need a module name for this module? > > I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In > this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There > is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? > I see that now. thanks, -- Shuah