From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4E7414A0E; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 05:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788500091; cv=none; b=ednOIG1/sc8+Bo5A3eAvHoxr5GP1Y/8ohTfuHBgB9C2NbIlRBT3TZXPA+rtgiKTulIyhIA9Lj/zHAli0y7J8oln/GaCrrmT9ZpBcwZHPldBqSnMTfrkGkT46RBLNLccVrdE6lMtBreLqe7vsKZqUN4zQs98foSVVBEwAxeqv3tc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788500091; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LoSIabbGCm3jmP8IHBvygHcW64OGDNns/l+oY3HHAo0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=g2n+LthfXIOyPuWdqCefifeJzEgUQgUBoMomVnCXZZLWusIQnUiwpKUb6pRyZnnep+vu6LidaRo82M8pAKomBEbXoSNJD7jeX4RDkYPFEqeVXzOQLexTYVLo4KNtvYSKxi4gdWYPqn5EzKO+6j8+TdNq55RmTuCmMdbRX1KdE0o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=NKESFmSW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="NKESFmSW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=noERAy98ksBHJQxSSGOOcw+tFMb50cbPWoj0qJBP4Mo=; b=NKESFmSWQ8HRKMj5l8wqqHRElj u+rcPL79KhjjEA2tcRYWH7yB1+oMOgFkQLlVFmvs67LksmNgMx46iHvj9nElPIaJmqGcVv0uGAKHM YMJSE9e8KhRnZHFBW47GNbYxpR4Er+bUZBOxqzO7+PeQkqit5uPdiZG9jsPigRrigTNPNepBmZXc3 6tJHJZsTM1WFVmavMCI0IQCfu4dO3fuLtFjVsEy1biOnvY00gCBAP0mhRsWe1Kw6UdKwMNrQzg+hf zop3u9f8PwvBj7fpJETU+kj2M1HfcKEt9oEB/nUDLFC8GWNjiRqV26efiIZCD+bMsykTYjL3TJVYY eyOs9evQ==; Received: from [50.53.43.113] (helo=[192.168.254.34]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x2MZW-000000014fy-12qQ; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 05:34:42 +0000 Message-ID: <24c2aa21-d491-4ee2-9d53-de593353f2cc@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 22:34:41 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: verify/bisect: fix typos, formating and punctuation To: Manuel Ebner , Thorsten Leemhuis , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260903154336.732305-3-manuelebnerli@mailbox.org> <4c379bf7-e518-4a06-8b12-134f39a45785@infradead.org> <6ba88e25314a5818f8fb31dc3a2165f6786e890d.camel@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <6ba88e25314a5818f8fb31dc3a2165f6786e890d.camel@mailbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9/3/26 10:18 PM, Manuel Ebner wrote: > On Thu, 2026-09-03 at 09:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Hi Manual, >> >> On 9/3/26 8:43 AM, Manuel Ebner wrote: >>> Improve readability. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner >>> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap >> >> It looks like you might be misusing the Reviewed-by: tag here. >> My only reply (to v1 of this patch) was: >>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/0475c09c-e165-41a5-b654-5c6aefeaab0b@infradead.org/ > > My thought process was: when I include all you suggestions and your message ends with >> All of the other changes LGTM. > > you are good with the result. Thus Reviewed. I understand, but still, it should be explicit (or you could ask). > I probably did this a couple more times with you and others. > > I'm sorry and I'll pay more attention to this. > >> and in that email I did not write "Reviewed-by: /me". >> Just because I commented on it does not mean that it merits >> a Reviewed-by: tag. >> I.e., a Reviewed-by: tag must be explicitly written by the reviewer >> for it to be included in a patch. >> >> Please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more info, > > I'll reread it. Thanks. -- ~Randy