Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Sourav Panda <souravpanda@google.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: add kselftest for ioctl interface
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:26:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26193499-e9dd-45e7-afc2-365685d6a749@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49f725a7-577d-4036-bd5a-5a33fc9e17c3@linux.dev>


On 2026/6/9 14:09, Hao Ge wrote:
> Hi Abhishek
>
>
> On 2026/6/6 07:36, Abhishek Bapat wrote:
>> Introduce a kselftest to verify the new IOCTL-based interface for
>> /proc/allocinfo. The test covers:
>>
>> 1. Validation of the filename filter.
>> 2. Validation of the function filter.
>>
>> The first test validates the functionality of the filename filter. Using
>> "mm/memory.c" as the candidate filename filter, it retrieves filtered
>> entries from both procfs and ioctl and matches the first VEC_MAX_ENTRIES
>> entries.
>>
>> The second test validates the functionality of the function filter.
>> It uses "dup_mm" as the candidate function as we do not expect this
>> function name to change frequently and hence won't be needing to modify
>> this test often.
>>
>> Note that both the tests match line no, function name and file name
>> fields. Bytes allocated and calls are not matched as those values may
>> change in the time when the data is being read from procfs and ioctl and
>> hence can lead to false negatives.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>>   tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile    |   9 +
>>   .../alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c          | 313 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 323 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
>>   create mode 100644 
>> tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 77f3fc487691..80560f5f1292 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -16713,6 +16713,7 @@ F:    include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>   F:    include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
>>   F:    include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>   F:    lib/alloc_tag.c
>> +F:    tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/
>>     MEMORY CONTROLLER DRIVERS
>>   M:    Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..f2b8fc022c3b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS := allocinfo_ioctl_test
>> +
>> +CFLAGS += -Wall
>> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include
>> +
>> +include ../lib.mk
>> +
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5c3c16e86c23
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +
>> +/* kselftest for allocinfo ioctl
>> + * allocinfo ioctl retrives allocinfo data through ioctl
>
>
> nit: s/retrives/retrieves/
>
>
> I've applied the full patch series locally and ran the kselftest, all 
> 4 tests pass:
>
> [root@localhost alloc_tag]# ./allocinfo_ioctl_test
> 1..4
> ok 1 test_filename_filter
> ok 2 test_function_filter
> ok 3 test_size_filter
> ok 4 test_lineno_filter
> # Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> But there are no tests for ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MODNAME and
>
> ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_INACCURATE.


Sorry, please disregard my suggestion about adding tests for

ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MODNAME and ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_INACCURATE.

ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MODNAME depends on kernel config and also requires

the module to be loaded. ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_INACCURATE entries may not

be common, unless we can find a stable way to produce them.


>
>
> Thanks
>
> Best Regards
>
> Hao
>
>> + * Copyright (C) 2026 Google, Inc.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <errno.h>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/alloc_tag.h>
>> +#include "../kselftest.h"
>> +
>> +#define MAX_LINE_LEN        512
>> +#define ALLOCINFO_PROC        "/proc/allocinfo"
>> +
>> +enum ioctl_ret {
>> +    IOCTL_SUCCESS = 0,
>> +    IOCTL_FAILURE = 1,
>> +    IOCTL_INVALID_DATA = 2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define VEC_MAX_ENTRIES 32
>> +
>> +struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec {
>> +    struct allocinfo_tag_data tag[VEC_MAX_ENTRIES];
>> +    __u64 count;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_content_id(int dev_fd, struct 
>> allocinfo_content_id *params)
>> +{
>> +    return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_CONTENT_ID, params);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_at(int dev_fd, struct 
>> allocinfo_get_at *params)
>> +{
>> +    return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_GET_AT, params);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_next(int dev_fd, struct 
>> allocinfo_tag_data *params)
>> +{
>> +    return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_GET_NEXT, params);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool match_entry(const struct allocinfo_tag_data *procfs_entry,
>> +            const struct allocinfo_tag_data *tag_data,
>> +            bool match_bytes, bool match_calls, bool match_lineno,
>> +            bool match_function, bool match_filename)
>> +{
>> +    if (match_bytes && tag_data->counter.bytes != 
>> procfs_entry->counter.bytes) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("size retrieved through ioctl does not match 
>> procfs\n");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (match_calls && tag_data->counter.calls != 
>> procfs_entry->counter.calls) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("call count retrieved through ioctl does not 
>> match procfs\n");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (match_lineno && tag_data->tag.lineno != 
>> procfs_entry->tag.lineno) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("lineno retrieved through ioctl does not 
>> match procfs\n");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (match_function &&
>> +        strncmp(tag_data->tag.function, procfs_entry->tag.function, 
>> ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE)) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("function retrieved through ioctl does not 
>> match procfs\n");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (match_filename &&
>> +        strncmp(tag_data->tag.filename, procfs_entry->tag.filename, 
>> ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE)) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("filename retrieved through ioctl does not 
>> match procfs\n");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +    return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool match_entries(const struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec 
>> *procfs_entries,
>> +              const struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags,
>> +              bool match_bytes, bool match_calls, bool match_lineno,
>> +              bool match_function, bool match_filename)
>> +{
>> +    __u64 i;
>> +
>> +    if (procfs_entries->count != tags->count) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Entry count mismatch. ioctl entries: %llu, 
>> proc entries: %llu\n",
>> +                   tags->count, procfs_entries->count);
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +    for (i = 0; i < procfs_entries->count; i++) {
>> +        if (!match_entry(&procfs_entries->tag[i], &tags->tag[i],
>> +                 match_bytes, match_calls, match_lineno,
>> +                 match_function, match_filename)) {
>> +            ksft_print_msg("%lluth entry does not match.\n", i);
>> +            return false;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int get_filtered_procfs_entries(struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec 
>> *procfs_entries,
>> +                       const struct allocinfo_filter *filter, int fd)
>> +{
>> +    FILE *fp = fdopen(fd, "r");
>> +    char line[MAX_LINE_LEN];
>> +    int matches;
>> +    struct allocinfo_tag_data procfs_entry;
>> +
>> +    if (!fp) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Failed to open " ALLOCINFO_PROC " for 
>> reading\n");
>> +        return 1;
>> +    }
>> +    memset(procfs_entries, 0, sizeof(*procfs_entries));
>> +    while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), fp) && procfs_entries->count < 
>> VEC_MAX_ENTRIES) {
>> +
>> +        memset(&procfs_entry, 0, sizeof(procfs_entry));
>> +        matches = sscanf(line, "%llu %llu %[^:]:%llu func:%s",
>> +                 &procfs_entry.counter.bytes,
>> +                 &procfs_entry.counter.calls,
>> +                 procfs_entry.tag.filename,
>> +                 &procfs_entry.tag.lineno,
>> +                 procfs_entry.tag.function);
>> +
>> +        if (matches != 5)
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME) {
>> +            if (strncmp(procfs_entry.tag.filename,
>> +                    filter->fields.filename, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE))
>> +                continue;
>> +        }
>> +        if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION) {
>> +            if (strncmp(procfs_entry.tag.function,
>> +                    filter->fields.function, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE))
>> +                continue;
>> +        }
>> +        if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_LINENO) {
>> +            if (procfs_entry.tag.lineno != filter->fields.lineno)
>> +                continue;
>> +        }
>> +        if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE) {
>> +            if (procfs_entry.counter.bytes < filter->min_size)
>> +                continue;
>> +        }
>> +        if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE) {
>> +            if (procfs_entry.counter.bytes > filter->max_size)
>> +                continue;
>> +        }
>> +
>> + memcpy(&procfs_entries->tag[procfs_entries->count++], &procfs_entry,
>> +               sizeof(procfs_entry));
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum ioctl_ret get_filtered_ioctl_entries(struct 
>> allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags,
>> +                         const struct allocinfo_filter *filter, int fd,
>> +                         __u64 start_pos)
>> +{
>> +    struct allocinfo_content_id start_cont_id, end_cont_id;
>> +    struct allocinfo_get_at get_at_params;
>> +    const int max_retries = 10;
>> +    int retry_count = 0;
>> +    int status;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * __allocinfo_get_content_id may return different values if a 
>> kernel module was loaded
>> +     * between the two calls. If that happens, the data gathered 
>> cannot be considered consistent
>> +     * and hence needs to be fetched again to avoid flakiness.
>> +     */
>> +    do {
>> +        if (__allocinfo_get_content_id(fd, &start_cont_id)) {
>> +            ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id failed\n");
>> +            return IOCTL_FAILURE;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        memset(tags, 0, sizeof(*tags));
>> +        memset(&get_at_params, 0, sizeof(get_at_params));
>> +        memcpy(&get_at_params.filter, filter, sizeof(*filter));
>> +        get_at_params.pos = start_pos;
>> +        if (__allocinfo_get_at(fd, &get_at_params)) {
>> +            ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_at failed\n");
>> +            return IOCTL_FAILURE;
>> +        }
>> +        memcpy(&tags->tag[tags->count++], &get_at_params.data, 
>> sizeof(get_at_params.data));
>> +
>> +        while (tags->count < VEC_MAX_ENTRIES &&
>> +               __allocinfo_get_next(fd, &tags->tag[tags->count]) == 0)
>> +            tags->count++;
>> +
>> +        if (__allocinfo_get_content_id(fd, &end_cont_id)) {
>> +            ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id failed\n");
>> +            return IOCTL_FAILURE;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        if (start_cont_id.id == end_cont_id.id) {
>> +            status = IOCTL_SUCCESS;
>> +        } else {
>> +            ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id mismatch, 
>> retrying...\n");
>> +            status = IOCTL_INVALID_DATA;
>> +        }
>> +    } while (status == IOCTL_INVALID_DATA && retry_count++ < 
>> max_retries);
>> +
>> +    return status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int run_filter_test(const struct allocinfo_filter *filter)
>> +{
>> +    int fd;
>> +    struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags = malloc(sizeof(*tags));
>> +    struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *procfs_entries = 
>> malloc(sizeof(*procfs_entries));
>> +    int ioctl_status;
>> +    int ret = KSFT_PASS;
>> +
>> +    if (!tags || !procfs_entries) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Memory allocation failed.\n");
>> +        ret = KSFT_FAIL;
>> +        goto freemem;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    fd = open(ALLOCINFO_PROC, O_RDONLY);
>> +    if (fd < 0) {
>> +        ksft_exit_skip("Failed to open " ALLOCINFO_PROC ": %s\n", 
>> strerror(errno));
>> +        ret = KSFT_FAIL;
>> +        goto freemem;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (get_filtered_procfs_entries(procfs_entries, filter, fd)) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Error retrieving entries from " 
>> ALLOCINFO_PROC "\n");
>> +        ret = KSFT_FAIL;
>> +        goto exit;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (procfs_entries->count == 0) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("No entries found in " ALLOCINFO_PROC ", 
>> skipping test\n");
>> +        ret = KSFT_SKIP;
>> +        goto exit;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    ioctl_status = get_filtered_ioctl_entries(tags, filter, fd, 0);
>> +    if (ioctl_status == IOCTL_INVALID_DATA) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Trouble retrieving valid IOCTL entries, 
>> skipping.\n");
>> +        ret = KSFT_SKIP;
>> +        goto exit;
>> +    }
>> +    if (ioctl_status == IOCTL_FAILURE) {
>> +        ksft_print_msg("Error retrieving IOCTL entries.\n");
>> +        ret = KSFT_FAIL;
>> +        goto exit;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!match_entries(procfs_entries, tags, false, false, true, 
>> true, true))
>> +        ret = KSFT_FAIL;
>> +
>> +exit:
>> +    close(fd);
>> +freemem:
>> +    free(tags);
>> +    free(procfs_entries);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int test_filename_filter(void)
>> +{
>> +    struct allocinfo_filter filter;
>> +    const char *target_filename = "mm/memory.c";
>> +
>> +    memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
>> +    filter.mask |= ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME;
>> +    strncpy(filter.fields.filename, target_filename, 
>> ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE);
>> +
>> +    return run_filter_test(&filter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int test_function_filter(void)
>> +{
>> +    struct allocinfo_filter filter;
>> +    const char *target_function = "dup_mm";
>> +
>> +    memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
>> +    filter.mask |= ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION;
>> +    strncpy(filter.fields.function, target_function, 
>> ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE);
>> +
>> +    return run_filter_test(&filter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ksft_set_plan(2);
>> +
>> +    ret = test_filename_filter();
>> +    if (ret == KSFT_SKIP)
>> +        ksft_test_result_skip("Skipping test_filename_filter\n");
>> +    else
>> +        ksft_test_result(ret == KSFT_PASS, "test_filename_filter\n");
>> +
>> +    ret = test_function_filter();
>> +    if (ret == KSFT_SKIP)
>> +        ksft_test_result_skip("Skipping test_function_filter\n");
>> +    else
>> +        ksft_test_result(ret == KSFT_PASS, "test_function_filter\n");
>> +
>> +    ksft_finished();
>> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05 23:36 [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl to /proc/allocinfo Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  1:52   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-09  0:19     ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  1:43       ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl filters " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  2:39   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] alloc_tag: add size-based filtering to ioctl Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  4:09   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] alloc_tag: add accuracy based " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  6:22   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08  8:24     ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08 20:55       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-09  0:51         ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  1:26         ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: add kselftest for ioctl interface Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  6:09   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-09  6:26     ` Hao Ge [this message]
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: extend the allocinfo ioctl kselftest Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-06  0:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Andrew Morton
2026-06-09  0:02   ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  0:29     ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26193499-e9dd-45e7-afc2-365685d6a749@linux.dev \
    --to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=abhishekbapat@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=souravpanda@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox