From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kas@kernel.org>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"Rick P Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/9] x86/efi: Disable LASS while mapping the EFI runtime services
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:04:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27b6cafe-8cc9-4a01-af2b-3e847ff9aaa9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cac58a25-eda6-4738-966f-a4e42818aa6c@app.fastmail.com>
On 10/31/2025 10:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I have another question: why is this one specific call a problem as opposed to something more general? Wouldn’t any EFI call that touches the low EFI mapping be a problem? Are there any odd code paths that touch low mapped EFI *data* that would fault?
>
I assumed EFI is running in physical mode before this.
efi_sync_low_kernel_mappings() is called right before calling
set_virtual_address_map(). So, this is the only call that happens at the
low mapping while switching to virtual mode.
But, my EFI knowledge is fairly limited. I am realizing that there are
some assumptions built into this patch that I may not be aware of.
> Is there some way to be reasonably convinced that you haven’t missed another EFI code path?
We have been running the patches on internal test platforms for a couple
of years. But, that would only cover the common paths. I'll dig deeper
to get you a convincing answer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 21:03 [PATCH v11 0/9] x86: Enable Linear Address Space Separation support Sohil Mehta
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate the LASS feature bits Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:03 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] x86/cpu: Add an LASS dependency on SMAP Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] x86/asm: Introduce inline memcpy and memset Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:06 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] x86/alternatives: Disable LASS when patching kernel code Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:10 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-10 18:15 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-11-10 19:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-10 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 13:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-12 14:51 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-12 14:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 15:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-12 15:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 15:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-12 15:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 16:18 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-11-12 16:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 16:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] x86/efi: Disable LASS while mapping the EFI runtime services Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:11 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-31 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-31 17:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-31 18:03 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-07 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 9:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-07 9:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-07 9:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-07 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-07 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-08 0:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-11-08 16:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-08 22:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-07 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 10:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-31 19:04 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-11-07 7:36 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 18:32 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] x86/kexec: Disable LASS during relocate kernel Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] x86/traps: Communicate a LASS violation in #GP message Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:16 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-31 19:59 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 20:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-31 20:56 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] selftests/x86: Update the negative vsyscall tests to expect a #GP Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:20 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-29 21:03 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] x86/cpu: Enable LASS by default during CPU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-10-30 8:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-30 15:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 16:44 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-30 16:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 17:24 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-30 17:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 21:13 ` David Laight
2025-10-31 6:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-31 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-30 16:27 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-07 8:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-07 20:08 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-31 17:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-31 20:04 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27b6cafe-8cc9-4a01-af2b-3e847ff9aaa9@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).