From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
corbet@lwn.net, dmatlack@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
pratyush@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, graf@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] liveupdate: defer session block allocation and PA setting
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 19:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzv7c0dg8e.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602031717.197696-9-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Tue, 2 Jun 2026 03:17:12 +0000")
On Tue, Jun 02 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Currently, luo_session_setup_outgoing() allocates the session block and
> sets its physical address in the header immediately. With upcoming
> dynamic block-based session management, this makes the first block
> different from the rest. Move the allocation to where it is first needed.
>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kho_block.h | 22 +++++++++++
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c | 4 +-
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h | 2 +-
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kho_block.h b/include/linux/kho_block.h
> index 505bf78409f2..0a8cda2cbfb5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kho_block.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kho_block.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,28 @@ int kho_block_set_restore(struct kho_block_set *bs, u64 head_pa);
> void kho_block_set_destroy(struct kho_block_set *bs);
> void kho_block_set_clear(struct kho_block_set *bs);
>
> +/**
> + * kho_block_set_head_pa - Get the physical address of the first block header.
> + * @bs: The block set.
> + *
> + * Return: The physical address of the first block header, or 0 if empty.
> + */
> +static inline u64 kho_block_set_head_pa(struct kho_block_set *bs)
> +{
> + return bs->head_pa;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kho_block_set_is_empty - Check if the block set has no allocated blocks.
> + * @bs: The block set.
> + *
> + * Return: True if there are no blocks in the set, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool kho_block_set_is_empty(struct kho_block_set *bs)
> +{
> + return list_empty(&bs->blocks);
> +}
> +
Are these intended to be here or should they go in patch 7?
> void kho_block_it_init(struct kho_block_it *it, struct kho_block_set *bs);
> void *kho_block_it_reserve_entry(struct kho_block_it *it);
> void *kho_block_it_read_entry(struct kho_block_it *it);
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 3:17 [PATCH v5 00/13] liveupdate: Remove limits on sessions and files Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] liveupdate: change file_set->count type to u64 for type safety Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] liveupdate: avoid mixing cleanup guards with goto in luo_session_retrieve_fd Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] liveupdate: centralize state management into struct luo_ser Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] liveupdate: register luo_ser as KHO subtree Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 17:02 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] liveupdate: Extract luo_file_deserialize_one helper Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] liveupdate: Extract luo_session_deserialize_one helper Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] kho: add support for linked-block serialization Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] liveupdate: defer session block allocation and PA setting Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 17:06 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 17:07 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-sessions kexec test Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-02 3:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-files " Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzv7c0dg8e.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox