From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB63C3F2D2 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B732072A for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="H5Ib57qv" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725963AbgCETTd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:19:33 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:53360 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725946AbgCETTd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:19:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Q0cdYZagAxQ35sfIY3akXlSzgSgXU3F+wa//Hvdh9+Q=; b=H5Ib57qvdKw7Mz/AanO+yK+B0W z84d3BuM78jl16s+/PVAaag/tyX0+t8qSY6EGzm3/BVB8ClfUvXDlcgxV4/TogYWR8ecIV+obfUVz lyxzhXrk/S43l8eO3plUmbBAC326NM2iaUmzGS2jr49MN+qf6/iZyTmdFDNTsbFE+t29xCOJ8unTo 1GVV5kgJoEt5iaZhiq6ULX4e2w66mbzEhje0jSYsZizWtdR8tFx/MzpGX0gbX+CR4QK7iK3jqj7yh /stDd00jI3HpNbAPjhgZtNvebZvCRnUGduAk3Xmjh7v/96vF340GUU5fIQzLiJVhNqu1qs9W+s3M/ 55uBzH6g==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0:897c:6038:c71d:ecac] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j9w1s-0007X5-Lz; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 19:19:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration documentation To: Markus Elfring , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Steven Rostedt , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <158339065180.26602.26457588086834858.stgit@devnote2> <158339066140.26602.7533299987467005089.stgit@devnote2> <3fb124a6-07d2-7a40-8981-07561aeb3c1e@web.de> <29c599ef-991d-a253-9f27-5999fb55b228@web.de> <997f73af-dc6c-bc8b-12ba-69270ee4b95d@infradead.org> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <32047314-c91e-0405-bcfe-43d515128231@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:19:32 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/20 11:06 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: >>>>> Which of the possibly unanswered issues do you find not concrete enough so far? >>>> >>>> e.g.: >>>>>>> Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges? >>> >>> Do you expect that known open issues need to be repeated for each patch revision? >> >> Ideally not, but not very much is ideal. > > Did you notice any aspects where I would be still looking for more helpful answers? Sorry, I haven't been tracking all of the email Q&A/response/replies all that carefully. > >> IOW, it is sometimes required (if one cares enough; sometimes >> one just gives up). > > I find this communication detail unfortunate occasionally. Sure. I do too. > >>> How do you think about the desired tracking of bug reports >>> also for this software? > … >> Masami seems to be responsive. > > The involved contributors show different response delays, don't they? That's always the case, in any of the Linux subsystems that I have been involved with. -- ~Randy