linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kas@kernel.org>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/15] x86/alternatives: Disable LASS when patching kernel alternatives
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:49:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34d91e30-9a94-4bbb-9a57-3679afbede2e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022095657.GBaPiqaYxPMonQWLtw@fat_crate.local>

On 10/22/2025 2:56 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 01:55:51PM -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> In the series, we directly write to the CR4 bits, so they don't have any
>> wrappers. But in the future, lass_enable()/lass_disable() could be
>> confusing if wrappers were added for the CR4 toggling.
> 
> Are you envisioning to export the CR4.LASS toggling to users like those two or
> is former going to be done only at those two places?
> 
> Because CR4 toggling is expensive so you probably don't want to do that very
> often.
> 

I agree. My expectation is that those won't grow much beyond the
existing ones.

My understanding from your discussion with PeterZ is that we would use
lass_enable()/_disable() with the LASS alternatives but leave the
existing stac()/clac() as-is.

Below is the updated patch with the rename and the text to clarify usages.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
index 4f84d421d1cf..4f4a4e0efff5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
@@ -23,18 +23,52 @@

 #else /* __ASSEMBLER__ */

+/*
+ * The CLAC/STAC instructions toggle the enforcement of
+ * X86_FEATURE_SMAP along with X86_FEATURE_LASS.
+ *
+ * SMAP enforcement is based on the _PAGE_BIT_USER bit in the page
+ * tables. The kernel is not allowed to touch pages with the bit set
+ * unless the AC bit is set.
+ *
+ * Use stac()/clac() when accessing userspace (_PAGE_USER) mappings,
+ * regardless of location.
+ *
+ * Note: a barrier is implicit in alternative().
+ */
+
 static __always_inline void clac(void)
 {
-	/* Note: a barrier is implicit in alternative() */
 	alternative("", "clac", X86_FEATURE_SMAP);
 }

 static __always_inline void stac(void)
 {
-	/* Note: a barrier is implicit in alternative() */
 	alternative("", "stac", X86_FEATURE_SMAP);
 }

+/*
+ * LASS enforcement is based on bit 63 of the virtual address. The
+ * kernel is not allowed to touch memory in the lower half of the
+ * virtual address space unless the AC bit is set.
+ *
+ * Use lass_disable()/lass_enable() when accessing kernel (!_PAGE_USER)
+ * mappings in the lower half of the address space that are blocked by
+ * LASS, but not by SMAP.
+ *
+ * Note: a barrier is implicit in alternative().
+ */
+
+static __always_inline void lass_enable(void)
+{
+	alternative("", "clac", X86_FEATURE_LASS);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void lass_disable(void)
+{
+	alternative("", "stac", X86_FEATURE_LASS);
+}
+
 static __always_inline unsigned long smap_save(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 8ee5ff547357..b38dbf08d5cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -2469,16 +2469,30 @@ void __init_or_module text_poke_early(void
*addr, const void *opcode,
 __ro_after_init struct mm_struct *text_poke_mm;
 __ro_after_init unsigned long text_poke_mm_addr;

+/*
+ * Text poking creates and uses a mapping in the lower half of the
+ * address space. Relax LASS enforcement when accessing the poking
+ * address.
+ *
+ * objtool enforces a strict policy of "no function calls within AC=1
+ * regions". Adhere to the policy by using inline versions of
+ * memcpy()/memset() that will never result in a function call.
+ */
+
 static void text_poke_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len)
 {
-	memcpy(dst, src, len);
+	lass_disable();
+	__inline_memcpy(dst, src, len);
+	lass_enable();
 }

 static void text_poke_memset(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len)
 {
 	int c = *(const int *)src;

-	memset(dst, c, len);
+	lass_disable();
+	__inline_memset(dst, c, len);
+	lass_enable();
 }

 typedef void text_poke_f(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-22 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-07  6:51 [PATCH v10 00/15] x86: Enable Linear Address Space Separation support Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 01/15] x86/cpu: Enumerate the LASS feature bits Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:19   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 18:28     ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-07 20:20       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 20:38         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 20:53           ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-16  3:10         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-07 20:49     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 23:16       ` Xin Li
2025-10-08 16:00         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-16 15:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 18:03     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 02/15] x86/asm: Introduce inline memcpy and memset Sohil Mehta
2025-10-21 12:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 13:48     ` David Laight
2025-10-21 18:06     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 03/15] x86/alternatives: Disable LASS when patching kernel alternatives Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 16:55   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:28     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 16:22       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 17:10         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-21 20:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 20:55     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-22  9:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-22 19:49         ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-10-22 20:03           ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-22  8:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22  9:40       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-22 10:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 10:52           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 04/15] x86/cpu: Set LASS CR4 bit as pinning sensitive Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:24   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 23:11     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 16:52       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 19:03         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 05/15] x86/cpu: Defer CR pinning enforcement until late_initcall() Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:23   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 23:05     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:36       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 20:45         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-15 21:17           ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-17 19:28   ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 06/15] x86/efi: Disable LASS while mapping the EFI runtime services Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 07/15] x86/kexec: Disable LASS during relocate kernel Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:43   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:33     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 08/15] x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the page fault emulation code Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:37   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 18:48     ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-07 19:53       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:52         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:42           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-30 16:58       ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 17:22         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-30 17:35           ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 19:28         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-30 21:37           ` David Laight
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 09/15] x86/traps: Consolidate user fixups in exc_general_protection() Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:46   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:41     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:43       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 10/15] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 11/15] x86/vsyscall: Disable LASS if vsyscall mode is set to EMULATE Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:43   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 12/15] x86/traps: Communicate a LASS violation in #GP message Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:07   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 13/15] x86/traps: Generalize #GP address decode and hint code Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:43   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 14/15] x86/traps: Provide additional hints for a kernel stack segment fault Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07  6:51 ` [PATCH v10 15/15] x86/cpu: Enable LASS by default during CPU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:42   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH v10 00/15] x86: Enable Linear Address Space Separation support Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-17 19:52   ` Sohil Mehta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34d91e30-9a94-4bbb-9a57-3679afbede2e@intel.com \
    --to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).