From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb()
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 18:46:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36c7224c-87a6-aa31-cfaa-06a0b168c68d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNMxmRsWVvqe=30JEhCqPdGvUcKUgLoe2VjfMbKfHwFyaA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022/5/23 16:22, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 at 03:50, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c
>> ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"),
>> which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses
>> to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write, this
>> is only defined on arm64, but it is a generic memory barrier, let's
>> add dma_mb() into documentation and include/asm-generic/barrier.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 11 ++++++-----
>> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> index b12df9137e1c..07a8b8e1b12a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> @@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
>>
>> (*) dma_wmb();
>> (*) dma_rmb();
>> + (*) dma_mb();
>>
>> These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
>> of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
>> @@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
>> The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
>> before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
>> us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
>> - can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior
>> - wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
>> - have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper
>> - writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
>> - here.
>> + can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and
>> + a dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed
>> + to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
>> + writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
>> + this guarantee and must not be used here.
> It seems you've changed that spacing. This document uses 2 spaces
> after a sentence-ending '.'. (My original suggestion included the 2
> spaces after dots.)
I don't know the rules, it seems that some uses 1 spaces, others are 2
spaces, but most
uses 2 spaces, will update.
> Otherwise it all looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 2:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Fix kcsan test_barrier fail and panic Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 2:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 8:22 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-23 10:46 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2022-05-23 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-23 2:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: kcsan: Support detecting more missing memory barriers Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 8:23 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36c7224c-87a6-aa31-cfaa-06a0b168c68d@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox