linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiongwei.song@windriver.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, kai.huang@intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	seanjc@google.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	xin3.li@intel.com, ebiggers@google.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peternewman@google.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 20/26] x86/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters when mbm_cntr_assign is enabled
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:22:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d32c528-24fb-e701-a70b-331d1a04493a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79b8049a-b213-4d86-a021-cfd9f7389f5b@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,

On 11/18/2024 11:18 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 10/29/24 4:21 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Assign/unassign counters on resctrl group creation/deletion. Two counters
>> are required per group, one for MBM total event and one for MBM local
>> event.
>>
>> There are a limited number of counters available for assignment. If these
>> counters are exhausted, the kernel will display the error message: "Out of
>> MBM assignable counters". However, it is not necessary to fail the
>> creation of a group due to assignment failures. Users have the flexibility
>> to modify the assignments at a later time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v9: Changed rdtgroup_assign_cntrs() and rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() to return void.
>>      Updated couple of rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() calls properly.
>>      Updated function comments.
>>
>> v8: Renamed rdtgroup_assign_grp to rdtgroup_assign_cntrs.
>>      Renamed rdtgroup_unassign_grp to rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs.
>>      Fixed the problem with unassigning the child MON groups of CTRL_MON group.
>>
>> v7: Reworded the commit message.
>>      Removed the reference of ABMC with mbm_cntr_assign.
>>      Renamed the function rdtgroup_assign_cntrs to rdtgroup_assign_grp.
>>
>> v6: Removed the redundant comments on all the calls of
>>      rdtgroup_assign_cntrs. Updated the commit message.
>>      Dropped printing error message on every call of rdtgroup_assign_cntrs.
>>
>> v5: Removed the code to enable/disable ABMC during the mount.
>>      That will be another patch.
>>      Added arch callers to get the arch specific data.
>>      Renamed fuctions to match the other abmc function.
>>      Added code comments for assignment failures.
>>
>> v4: Few name changes based on the upstream discussion.
>>      Commit message update.
>>
>> v3: This is a new patch. Patch addresses the upstream comment to enable
>>      ABMC feature by default if the feature is available.
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index b0cce3dfd062..a8d21b0b2054 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -2932,6 +2932,46 @@ static void schemata_list_destroy(void)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Called when a new group is created. If "mbm_cntr_assign" mode is enabled,
>> + * counters are automatically assigned. Each group can accommodate two counters:
>> + * one for the total event and one for the local event. Assignments may fail
>> + * due to the limited number of counters. However, it is not necessary to fail
>> + * the group creation and thus no failure is returned. Users have the option
>> + * to modify the counter assignments after the group has been created.
>> + */
>> +static void rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
>> +
>> +	if (!resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Called when a group is deleted. Counters are unassigned if it was in
>> + * assigned state.
>> + */
>> +static void rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
>> +
>> +	if (!resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   {
>>   	struct rdt_fs_context *ctx = rdt_fc2context(fc);
>> @@ -2991,6 +3031,8 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   		if (ret < 0)
>>   			goto out_mongrp;
>>   		rdtgroup_default.mon.mon_data_kn = kn_mondata;
>> +
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
> 
> I think counters should be assigned *before* the files exposing them
> are added to resctrl.

Sure.

> 
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	ret = rdt_pseudo_lock_init();
>> @@ -3021,8 +3063,10 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   out_psl:
>>   	rdt_pseudo_lock_release();
>>   out_mondata:
>> -	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>> +	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable()) {
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
>>   		kernfs_remove(kn_mondata);
> 
> ... and here remove the files before taking away the data exposed by them.

Sure.

> 
>> +	}
>>   out_mongrp:
>>   	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>>   		kernfs_remove(kn_mongrp);
>> @@ -3201,6 +3245,7 @@ static void free_all_child_rdtgrp(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>>   
>>   	head = &rdtgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list;
>>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(sentry, stmp, head, mon.crdtgrp_list) {
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(sentry);
>>   		free_rmid(sentry->closid, sentry->mon.rmid);
>>   		list_del(&sentry->mon.crdtgrp_list);
>>   
>> @@ -3241,6 +3286,8 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
>>   		cpumask_or(&rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask,
>>   			   &rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
>>   
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   		free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   
>>   		kernfs_remove(rdtgrp->kn);
>> @@ -3272,6 +3319,7 @@ static void rdt_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>   	for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>>   		reset_all_ctrls(r);
>>   	rmdir_all_sub();
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
>>   	rdt_pseudo_lock_release();
>>   	rdtgroup_default.mode = RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE;
>>   	schemata_list_destroy();
>> @@ -3280,6 +3328,7 @@ static void rdt_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>   		resctrl_arch_disable_alloc();
>>   	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>>   		resctrl_arch_disable_mon();
>> +
>>   	resctrl_mounted = false;
>>   	kernfs_kill_sb(sb);
>>   	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> 
> Unnecessary hunk.

ok

> 
>> @@ -3871,6 +3920,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   		goto out_unlock;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn);
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -3915,6 +3966,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto out_closid_free;
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn);
>>   
>>   	ret = rdtgroup_init_alloc(rdtgrp);
> 
> Please compare the above two hunks with earlier "x86/resctrl: Introduce cntr_id in mongroup for assignments".
> Earlier patch initializes the counters within mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc() while the above
> hunk assigns the counters after mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc() is called. Could this fragmentation be avoided
> with init done once within mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc()?

It seems more appropriate to call rdtgroup_cntr_id_init() inside 
mkdir_rdt_prepare(). This will initialize the cntr_id to MON_CNTR_UNSET.

And then call rdtgroup_assign_cntrs() inside mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc().

what do you think?


> 
>> @@ -3940,6 +3993,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   out_del_list:
>>   	list_del(&rdtgrp->rdtgroup_list);
>>   out_rmid_free:
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>>   	mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_free(rdtgrp);
>>   out_closid_free:
>>   	closid_free(closid);
>> @@ -4010,6 +4064,9 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_mon(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, cpumask_var_t tmpmask)
>>   	update_closid_rmid(tmpmask, NULL);
>>   
>>   	rdtgrp->flags = RDT_DELETED;
>> +
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -4056,6 +4113,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_ctrl(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, cpumask_var_t tmpmask)
>>   	cpumask_or(tmpmask, tmpmask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
>>   	update_closid_rmid(tmpmask, NULL);
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   	closid_free(rdtgrp->closid);
>>   
> 
> There is a potential problem here. rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() attempts to remove counter from
> all domains associated with the resource group. This may fail in any of the domains that results
> in the counter not being marked as free in the global map and not reset the counter in the
> resource group ... but the resource group is removed right after calling rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs().
> In this scenario there is thus a counter that is considered to be in use but not assigned to any
> resource group.
> 
>>From what I can tell there is a difference here between default resource group and the others:
> on remount of resctrl the default resource group will maintain knowledge of the counter that could
> not be unassigned. This means that unmount/remount of resctrl does not provide a real "clean slate"
> when it comes to counter assignment. Is this intended?
> 

Yes. Agree. It is not intended.

How about adding bitmap_zero() inside rdt_get_tree() to address this 
problem? Also need to reset the cntr_id in rdt_kill_sb().

-- 
- Babu Moger

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-22  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 23:21 [PATCH v9 00/26] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] x86/resctrl: Add __init attribute for the functions called in resctrl_late_init Babu Moger
2024-11-15 23:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 17:44     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-18 22:07       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 20:02         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] x86/resctrl: Add ABMC feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] x86/resctrl: Consolidate monitoring related data from rdt_resource Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] x86/resctrl: Detect Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring feature details Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce resctrl_file_fflags_init() to initialize fflags Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display monitor mode Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:00   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 19:04     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-18 22:07       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 18:25         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 21:37           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:02             ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-25 18:17               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 17:09                 ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-26 19:01                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 21:57                     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of monitoring counters Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 21:31     ` Moger, Babu
2025-02-03 13:26       ` Peter Newman
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce bitmap mbm_cntr_free_map to track assignable counters Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_total_cfg and mbm_local_cfg in struct rdt_hw_mon_domain Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] x86/resctrl: Remove MSR reading of event configuration value Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 16:50     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_map to track assignable counters at domain Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of free counters Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:57   ` Luck, Tony
2024-10-30 14:15     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-04 14:14   ` Peter Newman
2024-11-04 17:31     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-16  0:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 19:20     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 21:12       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 23:36         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-25 19:00           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 23:31             ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-26 23:56               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-27 14:57                 ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-27 19:05                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-28 11:10                     ` Peter Newman
2024-11-28 19:35                       ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-29  9:59                         ` Peter Newman
2024-11-29 17:06                           ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 10:43                             ` Peter Newman
2024-12-02 15:02                               ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 18:33                             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 19:48                               ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 20:15                                 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 20:42                                   ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 21:09                                     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 21:28                                       ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 21:47                                         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 22:06                                           ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for ABMC assignment Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:35   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce cntr_id in mongroup for assignments Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 20:02     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] x86/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_config_cntr() to assign a counter with ABMC Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:54   ` Luck, Tony
2024-10-30 14:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-16  0:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 20:12     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:18       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 18:54         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 21:52           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:15             ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to assign/update counter assignment Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 18:05     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:50       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 21:04         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 22:07           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:09             ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04  4:16   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to unassign a MBM counter Babu Moger
2024-11-04 14:16   ` Peter Newman
2024-11-04 18:21     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-05 10:35       ` Peter Newman
2024-11-05 19:58         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] x86/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters when mbm_cntr_assign is enabled Babu Moger
2024-11-18 17:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22  0:22     ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2024-11-22  0:26       ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 18:12         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 21:34           ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04  4:16   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-12-04 17:03     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-04 17:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04 17:19       ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] x86/resctrl: Report "Unassigned" for MBM events in mbm_cntr_assign mode Babu Moger
2024-11-18 17:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 19:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to switch between monitor modes Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] x86/resctrl: Configure mbm_cntr_assign mode if supported Babu Moger
2024-11-18 19:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 18:59     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] x86/resctrl: Update assignments on event configuration changes Babu Moger
2024-11-18 19:43   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21  2:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:58       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 20:12         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to list assignment states of all the groups Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify assignment states of " Babu Moger
2024-11-18 21:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 20:29     ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d32c528-24fb-e701-a70b-331d1a04493a@amd.com \
    --to=bmoger@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).