From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F8A1FA272; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 07:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754034977; cv=none; b=hK9LKtXsk17Hu+O8Th+mfIG9dyzxM3XZFhBzrH4g/v6zcnHaABsg5SuDDzPq65RTJ7A2FHoAlm5QL2fioaEg3wHg26OStSPSxWb/QkHZozbp0rW4j5/y2JvpqB+mt2RbKqxYbhZHLbR/XYHQ52QleYL02YFfA9q+spQLjGiAb/c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754034977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2UMcEhhoZlhjw6r12HgvrQgNjxVVNgnGO710rWLwQRU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PB7YGiJM9foy2qCrDL0AMHEe0oB1tbC71PcenYCzMSufHh/9b++u47cdmhorPVVKgEsxrqzZ6+h/LY8oJoOevZYIdbACSjeMEq7u6GTxzj1fY7W2KZNT8S8Ix+i+oTd2Gnw3+J7fXFsY1W6tDs+VR0FLhiH2Lo3vPf4T35fjo8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Fa/4b+/0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Fa/4b+/0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1754034976; x=1785570976; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=2UMcEhhoZlhjw6r12HgvrQgNjxVVNgnGO710rWLwQRU=; b=Fa/4b+/0XRXzOWzoeVGixXkqzm4+Gn2d1/rjJlYYGKFDhf/E5AQWoPKk 9S+0QUWSX1J3uMPHNaOy0Lmml7FkmX9k5oFygM6lYEOcBRTabefMN5sng ZGBbwgZTgNWcyXDP9DAO3+rZT6gwIXl5BYWtfGtVc0Q0CXa+j9uUchSho ckuwccYO7uvF/6hzH4EyRTHXEUw64z6LXAqF/0dDD5zCgQiGQdBxjpD6b fgfSEGy4Fm7Hj2HuEbd4PUA9XT0+/I74EJjH3wW9EDOXIUQr7hE1LYhG/ IjCjD5GtSv4kEoWi1uNJh/kDCVCsviflAJHuXg0LyoKsKIdKp+IGwsLik Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: u1QJuk1QQqa3jS/CCMcmuQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Jaf5aQ3mRHSTTbCs8sPNCg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11508"; a="60019011" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,255,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="60019011" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Aug 2025 00:56:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LfvIxM39S6WdKa7/E14LSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7BmRcL02RbS34FFYpdmvKA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,255,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="163942874" Received: from hrotuna-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.164]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Aug 2025 00:56:01 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Hendrik Hamerlinck , dwaipayanray1@gmail.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, joe@perches.com, corbet@lwn.net, apw@canonical.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: validate commit tag ordering In-Reply-To: <45f0995f-17ac-45a3-8bc0-3b276ee91a9d@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20250724072032.118554-1-hendrik.hamerlinck@hammernet.be> <53eb0068-008b-48e6-9b92-d92de2ed4fc9@kernel.org> <45f0995f-17ac-45a3-8bc0-3b276ee91a9d@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 10:55:55 +0300 Message-ID: <3e9106d35d41a044adeadffeea32fa096c9e1370@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 31/07/2025 13:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> B4 does not follow the proper order: > > There is no "proper order" in terms of absolute facts. Let's just decide whatever order b4 uses *is* the proper order, and save ourselves endless hours of debating! :p BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel