From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889B364A98; Thu, 15 May 2025 13:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747316242; cv=none; b=h9+dwYnobRgFpTpJ+/aOmU1T7LCyh74bRPhw0xswrjd+kizhPv2sGZssdlP4QESY4WwMXIerh3S4mxbUjYsezPaxh2saKF5k7TEIjFxZg4CHD5D8sEojxOMkbP9mRejNmrvgO5U8efG3yI7ieReFEAXTJHLwA1nlX9QhDIZRnFg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747316242; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tRYLw6tBTvAhc6J6URyjrQDPh6UpNCTh6BvndupisvQ=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=eiNRzT/rS9ov4iuCfiBZsplWfExpnv3BJXYGMD/nkfSqxxvmO6iZvAzqUx2uDY6tcCe2TJGZLs9Y52SY1xtlOOzCCqwtI+XzonWnCm8dAloB4ENKKXYuyBA1BHI+4inq/ko/QJr4wsEygd3FJ99KouCTSLQh14QrPv+OtT3bnaI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=p+83h6oP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="p+83h6oP" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZyrqB2szvz9st4; Thu, 15 May 2025 15:37:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1747316230; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tRYLw6tBTvAhc6J6URyjrQDPh6UpNCTh6BvndupisvQ=; b=p+83h6oP8n05gWvIrxLrvf/Vx7c7IO0T6BpuOE6OveQXll7sNsHd6uGiBmT9RNm29JeMz/ 0G2Ozr5ZVmvT/Ad7/GjjtL5PiJwXQUrvYAH7yTr8ZKw4qiX6TpH+vWaJ6h1IhHlkZJybEZ UHgmorSamGSBpRIaTX6ap6rJN/MM27pizkMryER1QiF+VW7ytKP0inDoXEyk7ID2Ga5emr MmJyzwBvghYadWic137i59KnkWHbrvQswNDXHmesVkT/V8s+Y+eA1BLVgy3NlgFyNjHwqJ qlkpn0ut3DtDWovLqVq5cmidkS4q1qTpvbcPm+d6ibbq+T3D1ERuYquiTQcQ8w== Message-ID: <3f1140397e628cfdf4156f02f5454f844003dc6d.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] PCI: Remove unnecessary prototype from pci.h From: Philipp Stanner Reply-To: phasta@kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko , Philipp Stanner Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Bjorn Helgaas , Mark Brown , David Lechner , Zijun Hu , Yang Yingliang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:37:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20250515124604.184313-2-phasta@kernel.org> <20250515124604.184313-8-phasta@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-ID: 5f02b5a74fc86c15c8d X-MBO-RS-META: 69d664s196o43ritmth8fyiyacshbjyn On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 16:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > pcim_intx() once was an internal PCI function, but since then has > > been > > published and is used by drivers, and, therefore, available in > > include/linux/pci.h. The function is not used within PCI anymore. > >=20 > > Remove pcim_intx()'s prototype from drivers/pci/pci.h >=20 > Can this be moved up in the series? Or is there other dependencies? > I.o.w. this > looks like a leftover from something of the previous work. >=20 That can be moved to anywhere, including a separate patch. It's an independent patch, a leftover from last year. But it's related to devres, because it was also added because of the problem with pcim_enable_device(). P.