From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E62C001DE for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232894AbjGZJcZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 05:32:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232913AbjGZJcF (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 05:32:05 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5715A1BE8; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4R9pXH4mt8z1GDFR; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:30:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.108.26] (10.67.108.26) by dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:31:00 +0800 Message-ID: <43731b35-c076-6d01-ad83-764fb2e9a8f0@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:30:49 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Content-Language: en-US To: Conor Dooley CC: Conor Dooley , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> <20230726-affix-employed-319aada685e7@wendy> From: "chenjiahao (C)" In-Reply-To: <20230726-affix-employed-319aada685e7@wendy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.108.26] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 2023/7/26 14:45, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:20:00AM +0800, chenjiahao (C) wrote: >> On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to >>> riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Conor. >> Hi, >> >> My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD >> (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and >> it seems all ok. >> Could you try applying with the base above, or >> is there any problem with that base? > There's some difference between linux-next and riscv/for-next that > prevents the patchwork automation from applying the patches. Oh, I see. There is definitely a difference, since linux-next applied a bugfix patch b690e266dae2 ("riscv: mm: fix truncation warning on RV32") recently, whereas riscv/for-next didn't. I have worked on a wrong base and thanks for reminding :) I will rebase onto riscv/for-next and post my v9 pathset soon, please check over there. Thanks, Jiahao