From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Hendrik Hamerlinck <hendrik.hamerlinck@hammernet.be>,
dwaipayanray1@gmail.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
joe@perches.com, corbet@lwn.net, apw@canonical.com,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: validate commit tag ordering
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:46:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45f0995f-17ac-45a3-8bc0-3b276ee91a9d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU2e+5Hf3v=C=sE=+25f_A=2=Zzw5rxvcT=hb75VC=iFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 31/07/2025 13:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 at 10:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 24/07/2025 09:20, Hendrik Hamerlinck wrote:
>>> Modified the checkpatch script to ensure that commit tags (e.g.,
>>> Signed-off-by, Reviewed-by, Acked-by, Tested-by, etc.) appear in the
>>> correct order according to kernel conventions [1].
>>
>> These are not the conventions I use for my subsystems and ask others to
>> follow, so imposing TIP rules to all maintainers needs broad consensus,
>> not (yet) checkpatch.
>>
>> What's more, I think above TIP rules are contradicting with existing,
>> widely used and approved toolset - b4. So no, if you want universal
>> tool, please use b4 or whatever b4 defines.
>
> B4 does not follow the proper order:
There is no "proper order" in terms of absolute facts.
> 1. Multiple Reviewed-by tags may be added in a different order
> than given,
Maybe this could be fixed.
> 2. When applying my own patches, b4 adds the given tags before
> instead of after my own SoB.
This is working exactly as expected (intentional), explained few times
by Konstantin. Some people of course have different opinion and prefer
different order (I know few subsystems), but majority I think accepted
Konstantin's explanation.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-24 7:20 [PATCH] checkpatch: validate commit tag ordering Hendrik Hamerlinck
2025-07-24 15:04 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-07-24 19:10 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-07-24 19:43 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-07-25 8:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-31 11:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-31 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-08-01 7:55 ` Jani Nikula
2025-08-02 10:12 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-08-02 16:26 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-07-26 7:34 ` Hendrik Hamerlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45f0995f-17ac-45a3-8bc0-3b276ee91a9d@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hendrik.hamerlinck@hammernet.be \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).