From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.itxnorge.no (itx-kvm-14.itxnorge.no [91.189.121.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817D3AC0C8; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.189.121.228 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790197024; cv=none; b=J34sTVYbxHj60q2GIZESCfYfLEWw/7eqt/dfNaLwRbSEkONUa1u3fyFvOjTjdNmAh/+a+K7KEoCFEGtDDdmTKmSb+GGegO6FNW4zMMwP5UNtnL2Uzv2V6AeHIAUQSCymDTh/npYZAMs3yXFNkshPpw62RnTs0c6LBbc7ltzibjQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790197024; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zgd9EYXjfCotOgPT2J1zHMkAfVG8iyoh91G3Xdd+CWE=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=KXyNrcNUva1yl9Tee/4WlFO9nxNaaAzaoCxKmdXFPVULHqfW4TNrpqR9mw0lyhOWiFkjyQej9AAtIgeAbnr8yVEYf+0v10m5kST/owgjRIV06V8wUycKxmFc5mPF8JaoAZLXtqvLxxMHW6XvbW0U4e4sw+c3+QPvXLgEFJB9aI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=itx.no; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=itx.no; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=itx.no header.i=@itx.no header.b=iBejrJgo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.189.121.228 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=itx.no Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=itx.no Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=itx.no header.i=@itx.no header.b="iBejrJgo" Message-ID: <4927bb40f34ec6d3d5591dabba755452bd6b4a39.camel@itx.no> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itx.no; s=mx.itx.no; t=1790197019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Zgd9EYXjfCotOgPT2J1zHMkAfVG8iyoh91G3Xdd+CWE=; b=iBejrJgoPxKBztcQcgVdxSdRTWcAkVfO0RZrDb7hu4dUdY3/qrD7kZ9pkRPv+y4zbP41q6 P9DeYAc8PezeZwWXd00TRyAd3bVvNELgzsjNQ2VL5+TZ4h2mbNT8AsJGMpoUg08L0azFU0 PMJL57KcDToZBaX06WXoqRHFzMDmMWU= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks From: Stian Halseth To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andreas Larsson , "David S. Miller" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Magnus Lindholm , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:56:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20260923090429.2026529-1-stian@itx.no> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-F+1UqHVTzc7TRQwvfyjr" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 --=-F+1UqHVTzc7TRQwvfyjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ian, On Wed, 2026-09-23 at 13:38 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: >=20 >=20 > For the series: >=20 > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers >=20 Since this series is still marked RFC,=A0should I resend it as a regular PATCH v4 with your Reviewed-by, or wait for additional maintainer feedback? And thank you so much for the reviews! Stian --=-F+1UqHVTzc7TRQwvfyjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTK1ph9OaYoND1R57zoeAEuJe36VgUCarQ9GQAKCRDoeAEuJe36 Vl4eAQD+uEQ1n9fexqsHAW+RClIdJRwVU+vkiz1xd2YN7/TRBAEAt1mGBqpE68ca BxWIdAv2OtDaW1ZRb5GRmiUmT5dxlgg= =tWXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-F+1UqHVTzc7TRQwvfyjr--