From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:26:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49eeff09-993f-42a0-8e3b-b3f95b41dbcf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24f995fe-df76-4495-b9c6-9339b6afa6be@suse.cz>
On 21/07/2025 12.40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 7/15/25 20:58, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>> On 15/07/2025 10.43, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the
>>> module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules
>>> only. It would be possible to restrict it technically, but it was
>>> pointed out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an
>>> in-tree module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those
>>> also have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out in the
>>> macro name.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFleJN_fE-RbSoFD@infradead.org/ [1]
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNATRkZHwJGpojCnvdiaoDnP%2BaeUXgdey5sb_8muzdWTMkA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]
>>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>>> ---
>>> Daniel, please clarify if you'll take this via module tree or Christian
>>> can take it via vfs tree?
>>
>> Patch 707f853d7fa3 ("module: Provide EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES() helper")
>> from Peter was merged through Masahiro in v6.16-rc1. Since this is a related
>> fix/rename/cleanup, it'd make sense for it to go through his kbuild tree as
>> well. Masahiro, please let me know if you'd prefer otherwise. If not, I'll queue
>> it up in the modules tree.
>
> Maybe with no reply, you can queue it then?
+ Jiri, Stephen and Greg, added to the To: list.
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES macro was merged [1] through Masahiro's
pull request in v6.16-rc1. This patch from Vlastimil renames the macro to
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES. This means Jiri's patch b20d6576cdb3 "serial: 8250:
export RSA functions" will need to be updated accordingly. I'd like like to
know how you prefer to proceed, since it was requested to have this merged as a
fix before Linus releases a new kernel with the former name.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNAQunzxOHR+vMZLf8kqxyRtLx-Z2G2VZquJmndrT9TZjiQ@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Masahiro, just a heads-up that I plan to merge this through the linux-modules
tree unless you advise otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 8:43 [PATCH v3] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-15 18:58 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-07-21 10:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-22 8:26 ` Daniel Gomez [this message]
2025-07-22 8:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-22 8:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-22 8:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-22 9:08 ` Daniel Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49eeff09-993f-42a0-8e3b-b3f95b41dbcf@kernel.org \
--to=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maennich@google.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).