From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Sourav Panda <souravpanda@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: add kselftest for ioctl interface
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:09:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49f725a7-577d-4036-bd5a-5a33fc9e17c3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e55b3b1388a4f7a59f670a83f222ba6c836ac4e.1780701922.git.abhishekbapat@google.com>
Hi Abhishek
On 2026/6/6 07:36, Abhishek Bapat wrote:
> Introduce a kselftest to verify the new IOCTL-based interface for
> /proc/allocinfo. The test covers:
>
> 1. Validation of the filename filter.
> 2. Validation of the function filter.
>
> The first test validates the functionality of the filename filter. Using
> "mm/memory.c" as the candidate filename filter, it retrieves filtered
> entries from both procfs and ioctl and matches the first VEC_MAX_ENTRIES
> entries.
>
> The second test validates the functionality of the function filter.
> It uses "dup_mm" as the candidate function as we do not expect this
> function name to change frequently and hence won't be needing to modify
> this test often.
>
> Note that both the tests match line no, function name and file name
> fields. Bytes allocated and calls are not matched as those values may
> change in the time when the data is being read from procfs and ioctl and
> hence can lead to false negatives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile | 9 +
> .../alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c | 313 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 323 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 77f3fc487691..80560f5f1292 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -16713,6 +16713,7 @@ F: include/linux/alloc_tag.h
> F: include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
> F: include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
> F: lib/alloc_tag.c
> +F: tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/
>
> MEMORY CONTROLLER DRIVERS
> M: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f2b8fc022c3b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS := allocinfo_ioctl_test
> +
> +CFLAGS += -Wall
> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include
> +
> +include ../lib.mk
> +
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5c3c16e86c23
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/allocinfo_ioctl_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +/* kselftest for allocinfo ioctl
> + * allocinfo ioctl retrives allocinfo data through ioctl
nit: s/retrives/retrieves/
I've applied the full patch series locally and ran the kselftest, all 4
tests pass:
[root@localhost alloc_tag]# ./allocinfo_ioctl_test
1..4
ok 1 test_filename_filter
ok 2 test_function_filter
ok 3 test_size_filter
ok 4 test_lineno_filter
# Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
But there are no tests for ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MODNAME and
ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_INACCURATE.
Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
> + * Copyright (C) 2026 Google, Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/alloc_tag.h>
> +#include "../kselftest.h"
> +
> +#define MAX_LINE_LEN 512
> +#define ALLOCINFO_PROC "/proc/allocinfo"
> +
> +enum ioctl_ret {
> + IOCTL_SUCCESS = 0,
> + IOCTL_FAILURE = 1,
> + IOCTL_INVALID_DATA = 2,
> +};
> +
> +#define VEC_MAX_ENTRIES 32
> +
> +struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec {
> + struct allocinfo_tag_data tag[VEC_MAX_ENTRIES];
> + __u64 count;
> +};
> +
> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_content_id(int dev_fd, struct allocinfo_content_id *params)
> +{
> + return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_CONTENT_ID, params);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_at(int dev_fd, struct allocinfo_get_at *params)
> +{
> + return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_GET_AT, params);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __allocinfo_get_next(int dev_fd, struct allocinfo_tag_data *params)
> +{
> + return ioctl(dev_fd, ALLOCINFO_IOC_GET_NEXT, params);
> +}
> +
> +static bool match_entry(const struct allocinfo_tag_data *procfs_entry,
> + const struct allocinfo_tag_data *tag_data,
> + bool match_bytes, bool match_calls, bool match_lineno,
> + bool match_function, bool match_filename)
> +{
> + if (match_bytes && tag_data->counter.bytes != procfs_entry->counter.bytes) {
> + ksft_print_msg("size retrieved through ioctl does not match procfs\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (match_calls && tag_data->counter.calls != procfs_entry->counter.calls) {
> + ksft_print_msg("call count retrieved through ioctl does not match procfs\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (match_lineno && tag_data->tag.lineno != procfs_entry->tag.lineno) {
> + ksft_print_msg("lineno retrieved through ioctl does not match procfs\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (match_function &&
> + strncmp(tag_data->tag.function, procfs_entry->tag.function, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("function retrieved through ioctl does not match procfs\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (match_filename &&
> + strncmp(tag_data->tag.filename, procfs_entry->tag.filename, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("filename retrieved through ioctl does not match procfs\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool match_entries(const struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *procfs_entries,
> + const struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags,
> + bool match_bytes, bool match_calls, bool match_lineno,
> + bool match_function, bool match_filename)
> +{
> + __u64 i;
> +
> + if (procfs_entries->count != tags->count) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Entry count mismatch. ioctl entries: %llu, proc entries: %llu\n",
> + tags->count, procfs_entries->count);
> + return false;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < procfs_entries->count; i++) {
> + if (!match_entry(&procfs_entries->tag[i], &tags->tag[i],
> + match_bytes, match_calls, match_lineno,
> + match_function, match_filename)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("%lluth entry does not match.\n", i);
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_filtered_procfs_entries(struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *procfs_entries,
> + const struct allocinfo_filter *filter, int fd)
> +{
> + FILE *fp = fdopen(fd, "r");
> + char line[MAX_LINE_LEN];
> + int matches;
> + struct allocinfo_tag_data procfs_entry;
> +
> + if (!fp) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Failed to open " ALLOCINFO_PROC " for reading\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + memset(procfs_entries, 0, sizeof(*procfs_entries));
> + while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), fp) && procfs_entries->count < VEC_MAX_ENTRIES) {
> +
> + memset(&procfs_entry, 0, sizeof(procfs_entry));
> + matches = sscanf(line, "%llu %llu %[^:]:%llu func:%s",
> + &procfs_entry.counter.bytes,
> + &procfs_entry.counter.calls,
> + procfs_entry.tag.filename,
> + &procfs_entry.tag.lineno,
> + procfs_entry.tag.function);
> +
> + if (matches != 5)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME) {
> + if (strncmp(procfs_entry.tag.filename,
> + filter->fields.filename, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE))
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION) {
> + if (strncmp(procfs_entry.tag.function,
> + filter->fields.function, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE))
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_LINENO) {
> + if (procfs_entry.tag.lineno != filter->fields.lineno)
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE) {
> + if (procfs_entry.counter.bytes < filter->min_size)
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE) {
> + if (procfs_entry.counter.bytes > filter->max_size)
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&procfs_entries->tag[procfs_entries->count++], &procfs_entry,
> + sizeof(procfs_entry));
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum ioctl_ret get_filtered_ioctl_entries(struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags,
> + const struct allocinfo_filter *filter, int fd,
> + __u64 start_pos)
> +{
> + struct allocinfo_content_id start_cont_id, end_cont_id;
> + struct allocinfo_get_at get_at_params;
> + const int max_retries = 10;
> + int retry_count = 0;
> + int status;
> +
> + /*
> + * __allocinfo_get_content_id may return different values if a kernel module was loaded
> + * between the two calls. If that happens, the data gathered cannot be considered consistent
> + * and hence needs to be fetched again to avoid flakiness.
> + */
> + do {
> + if (__allocinfo_get_content_id(fd, &start_cont_id)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id failed\n");
> + return IOCTL_FAILURE;
> + }
> +
> + memset(tags, 0, sizeof(*tags));
> + memset(&get_at_params, 0, sizeof(get_at_params));
> + memcpy(&get_at_params.filter, filter, sizeof(*filter));
> + get_at_params.pos = start_pos;
> + if (__allocinfo_get_at(fd, &get_at_params)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_at failed\n");
> + return IOCTL_FAILURE;
> + }
> + memcpy(&tags->tag[tags->count++], &get_at_params.data, sizeof(get_at_params.data));
> +
> + while (tags->count < VEC_MAX_ENTRIES &&
> + __allocinfo_get_next(fd, &tags->tag[tags->count]) == 0)
> + tags->count++;
> +
> + if (__allocinfo_get_content_id(fd, &end_cont_id)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id failed\n");
> + return IOCTL_FAILURE;
> + }
> +
> + if (start_cont_id.id == end_cont_id.id) {
> + status = IOCTL_SUCCESS;
> + } else {
> + ksft_print_msg("allocinfo_get_content_id mismatch, retrying...\n");
> + status = IOCTL_INVALID_DATA;
> + }
> + } while (status == IOCTL_INVALID_DATA && retry_count++ < max_retries);
> +
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static int run_filter_test(const struct allocinfo_filter *filter)
> +{
> + int fd;
> + struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *tags = malloc(sizeof(*tags));
> + struct allocinfo_tag_data_vec *procfs_entries = malloc(sizeof(*procfs_entries));
> + int ioctl_status;
> + int ret = KSFT_PASS;
> +
> + if (!tags || !procfs_entries) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Memory allocation failed.\n");
> + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> + goto freemem;
> + }
> +
> + fd = open(ALLOCINFO_PROC, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to open " ALLOCINFO_PROC ": %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> + goto freemem;
> + }
> +
> + if (get_filtered_procfs_entries(procfs_entries, filter, fd)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Error retrieving entries from " ALLOCINFO_PROC "\n");
> + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (procfs_entries->count == 0) {
> + ksft_print_msg("No entries found in " ALLOCINFO_PROC ", skipping test\n");
> + ret = KSFT_SKIP;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ioctl_status = get_filtered_ioctl_entries(tags, filter, fd, 0);
> + if (ioctl_status == IOCTL_INVALID_DATA) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Trouble retrieving valid IOCTL entries, skipping.\n");
> + ret = KSFT_SKIP;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + if (ioctl_status == IOCTL_FAILURE) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Error retrieving IOCTL entries.\n");
> + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (!match_entries(procfs_entries, tags, false, false, true, true, true))
> + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> +
> +exit:
> + close(fd);
> +freemem:
> + free(tags);
> + free(procfs_entries);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int test_filename_filter(void)
> +{
> + struct allocinfo_filter filter;
> + const char *target_filename = "mm/memory.c";
> +
> + memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
> + filter.mask |= ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME;
> + strncpy(filter.fields.filename, target_filename, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE);
> +
> + return run_filter_test(&filter);
> +}
> +
> +static int test_function_filter(void)
> +{
> + struct allocinfo_filter filter;
> + const char *target_function = "dup_mm";
> +
> + memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
> + filter.mask |= ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION;
> + strncpy(filter.fields.function, target_function, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE);
> +
> + return run_filter_test(&filter);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ksft_set_plan(2);
> +
> + ret = test_filename_filter();
> + if (ret == KSFT_SKIP)
> + ksft_test_result_skip("Skipping test_filename_filter\n");
> + else
> + ksft_test_result(ret == KSFT_PASS, "test_filename_filter\n");
> +
> + ret = test_function_filter();
> + if (ret == KSFT_SKIP)
> + ksft_test_result_skip("Skipping test_function_filter\n");
> + else
> + ksft_test_result(ret == KSFT_PASS, "test_function_filter\n");
> +
> + ksft_finished();
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 23:36 [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl to /proc/allocinfo Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08 1:52 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-09 0:19 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09 1:43 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl filters " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08 2:39 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] alloc_tag: add size-based filtering to ioctl Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08 4:09 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] alloc_tag: add accuracy based " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08 6:22 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08 8:24 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08 20:55 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-09 0:51 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09 1:26 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: add kselftest for ioctl interface Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09 6:09 ` Hao Ge [this message]
2026-06-09 6:26 ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: extend the allocinfo ioctl kselftest Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-06 0:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Andrew Morton
2026-06-09 0:02 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09 0:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49f725a7-577d-4036-bd5a-5a33fc9e17c3@linux.dev \
--to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=abhishekbapat@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox