From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4170635202A for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 15:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788708147; cv=none; b=hKPVpqZ2jk9ulf3i6DIML8D5XLOb0Zc9W977vfMNRrrCyS5v8GLWhYsVF0BVY4S4LXr2Cn57+pxT7yKYknMXol3WLJFPDJK2jL1uOMTyfQ8PSYdzQnOFF3IqeS9oYVXGZfrvG2CqHgkTBf3Pg7Dwkn7wM3picV0zufqDw2wniKM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788708147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2RuwsSOghu+1sW6+flmIsf2dgGKOVqUcim+HV99LCPk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=BojVzHOdgb1HEpzUJnprwIdjr2Q35FEe4oa3zHEthAd17gbtjZZ2rUYf4ZBHf0/ip6VxmxuYljvr9mKRegc63NdjxsW6Dn5ouRBiFL3/cqmFgLJnruLmrt4DpaSpCxplwRb2Xgc/vitZW5OzF+7qpJRtWUcX9iPrFXaF24q94rg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=G0/w3IiX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G0/w3IiX" Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4980fe6b3beso26679105e9.0 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:22:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1788708144; x=1789312944; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=mQBEKZMfj7YKELN51p7vaiO9vxhxgKuR+dj6LxJhir8=; b=G0/w3IiXLP3dBYLWCeC24tkdTF63Z7WvkbX9KAYvLDm4s0hQnBlnVtBu+sQHytwOFH VDIvxZhSj1eT0Cb+jhVf9IWUlTSQux2v8b6uIHNMAvu7qga2u0e+zQ6K8M6izvGijvS9 RZp8EfEoIZ1qbPbsEiV5khJ2JX5OO909c9kvzmdug26zqj9lpw+KyMx12LwPLKbLACWY j47jIJdF/kiB7l7Pc6yVv7Ggdx4VAZNN0TvOWeuIXT42inHQ0qLQbGZbfw/fYHclasKJ HplOM9vb9fEao9Nl57BNTBnY3rSNOoLd6VgzxdnN1r119k2AXMRDHMvWj+/e6rDVWAQe qWVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1788708144; x=1789312944; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=mQBEKZMfj7YKELN51p7vaiO9vxhxgKuR+dj6LxJhir8=; b=VEq6/zLdbxVh3XMn1xznO3pDhGa1yy3dg6LVWnIbp6NgQr/f5aLee2I1hrbdVBWoaA onlYMAEoOSC282PJT719KHWIsMiHoXeK0ZHAnwEgu7jXmfxx9lhRrFzLMA8tSgZ0z5uW EiKO/+NqUtYuaZs4csuO5YqiPx+ZIZyU8LY+jIIo0AMvCNF396uG4VEWTXTf2CchzpA6 teQL2Pf7b16YATCoEk661yTUNBMK4B0oBpeVunnIgxNyS896vpeWDdjQYtFr1ScCUvzV 5vldwWjHbuCeNIdVfIUaqzA/vocEy2WhP77d6UsTleMlX4Tpsvxs7zzDfpO9x5l+DTgb zXjA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvByGLVStPumV4aDwtNHXGxzDUHnLJz+Mhz/oCx2nbD/Chp1ks0/rpcwRuYJfxUwad2ot2MjDZUkdiWE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++k4kR1C9LPnme9CdHJNoeHGdycVdl+wt0V1bGlXmg5I416QJqdc aPlXlbrRPL6IRxot7XRtTRL8im1keejcwf60GreEmemyNbUQnzsEcfIE X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2a3GYYSIOjxDocTkICOY/C3/uqVDDDaVGhdTiaFmXZLubM5345xVASAzy5WqR LxoIGMBww4AQ+NagjdWe7YRqWdhi2sV4RE4mbuRikmux0tOUXIwAkchUjbomKqD1YGXfdrtDCfo sgl3Epc59PU9GiQCIjZpARCVzPHdPXFTejn0rEZR47j2uFU1vu36aWaPbBFgPboYrGin9pOl0gq FDUs+vrdKssad/fbwBO/yFAKI0CuOqBPIekZTp2FANOJ46DmhQ1TZVa+yE2DXiqkACSzR4XIgGj Bx+uBzV7GMeIwW45pnQo1CAyOC8ov1Wvf9PuExjeCMRYHT1YYCkD6fwFIMUtM1VQyjQhpOmsTaW fJDPIqm0JDxroO4hghpW5MVqZaixV+O46WWGusAaoY3jIBRfOauHPMxvLoKUn4F9IdvGzhC7+Nq 38+L6LxPjjPdR3XfPNR/ec7C74ATWPC6UuPTfWl5nrHAPthdXtz/WIqv0xrIXtRCyJXkxil1bSa Ym5UqItweWlFIceNYsbaXmZ0u8AWonkjFfzAmHHtvCFSBanSX+sIAikVv69WCUKjvI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5247:b0:49c:ee3b:723d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49cf81f69ddmr163847855e9.0.1788708144138; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.128.10.232] (195-23-151-163.net.novis.pt. [195.23.151.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-49d0656e7bbsm137239825e9.10.2026.09.06.08.22.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julian Braha Message-ID: <4bdaab67-87d7-4c5c-8cb5-ac0f9add4d97@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 16:22:21 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] add kconfirm To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: nsc@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, gary@garyguo.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ljs@kernel.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev, masahiroy@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, qingfang.deng@linux.dev, demiobenour@gmail.com, ej@inai.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org References: <20260727001623.2794156-1-julianbraha@gmail.com> <51ade68e-7a0c-454e-a48a-4c72f7a730ac@gmail.com> <20260904220559.GB2787252@ax162> Content-Language: en-US From: Julian Braha In-Reply-To: <20260904220559.GB2787252@ax162> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/4/26 23:05, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > My apologies for not getting to this sooner, I have been busy with some > other projects. I will try to play around with this from a usability > perspective (which is what I am most concerned with at this point). If a > v5 is mostly prepared, I would not mind seeing it even if we want to go > the in-tree interpreter checks. One option is to take kconfirm into the > tree, fix up the warnings it generates, then moving the checks into the > interpreter directly while dropping them from kconfirm (since the tree > should be clean at that point). I am open to opinions on that though. > Your strategy makes sense to me. I'll send v5 then, but I'd also like to make sure that Nicolas is onboard with this idea. - Julian Braha