From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: guoren@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, anup@brainfault.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
palmer@rivosinc.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com, keescook@chromium.org,
greentime.hu@sifive.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 05/19] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:51:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cc7113a-0e4e-763a-cba2-7963bcd26c7a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802164701.192791-6-guoren@kernel.org>
On 8/2/23 12:46, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Combo spinlock could support queued and ticket in one Linux Image and
> select them during boot time via errata mechanism. Here is the func
> size (Bytes) comparison table below:
>
> TYPE : COMBO | TICKET | QUEUED
> arch_spin_lock : 106 | 60 | 50
> arch_spin_unlock : 54 | 36 | 26
> arch_spin_trylock : 110 | 72 | 54
> arch_spin_is_locked : 48 | 34 | 20
> arch_spin_is_contended : 56 | 40 | 24
> rch_spin_value_unlocked : 48 | 34 | 24
>
> One example of disassemble combo arch_spin_unlock:
> 0xffffffff8000409c <+14>: nop # detour slot
> 0xffffffff800040a0 <+18>: fence rw,w # queued spinlock start
> 0xffffffff800040a4 <+22>: sb zero,0(a4) # queued spinlock end
> 0xffffffff800040a8 <+26>: ld s0,8(sp)
> 0xffffffff800040aa <+28>: addi sp,sp,16
> 0xffffffff800040ac <+30>: ret
> 0xffffffff800040ae <+32>: lw a5,0(a4) # ticket spinlock start
> 0xffffffff800040b0 <+34>: sext.w a5,a5
> 0xffffffff800040b2 <+36>: fence rw,w
> 0xffffffff800040b6 <+40>: addiw a5,a5,1
> 0xffffffff800040b8 <+42>: slli a5,a5,0x30
> 0xffffffff800040ba <+44>: srli a5,a5,0x30
> 0xffffffff800040bc <+46>: sh a5,0(a4) # ticket spinlock end
> 0xffffffff800040c0 <+50>: ld s0,8(sp)
> 0xffffffff800040c2 <+52>: addi sp,sp,16
> 0xffffffff800040c4 <+54>: ret
>
> The qspinlock is smaller and faster than ticket-lock when all are in
> fast-path, and combo spinlock could provide a compatible Linux Image
> for different micro-arch design (weak/strict fwd guarantee) processors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 9 +++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 10 ++++
> 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index e89a3bea3dc1..119e774a3dcf 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
>
> choice
> prompt "RISC-V spinlock type"
> - default RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS
> + default RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
>
> config RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS
> bool "Using ticket spinlock"
> @@ -452,6 +452,13 @@ config RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> help
> Make sure your micro arch LL/SC has a strong forward progress guarantee.
> Otherwise, stay at ticket-lock.
> +
> +config RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> + bool "Using combo spinlock"
> + depends on SMP && MMU
> + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> + help
> + Select queued spinlock or ticket-lock via errata.
> endchoice
>
> config RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index f041bfa7f6a0..08ae75a694c2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI 41
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM 42
>
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XTICKETLOCK 63
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX 64
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_NAME_LEN_MAX 32
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index c644a92d4548..9eb3ad31e564 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -7,11 +7,94 @@
> #define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS (1 << 9)
> #endif
>
I see why you separated the _Q_PENDING_LOOPS out.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> +#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
> +
> +#undef arch_spin_is_locked
> +#undef arch_spin_is_contended
> +#undef arch_spin_value_unlocked
> +#undef arch_spin_lock
> +#undef arch_spin_trylock
> +#undef arch_spin_unlock
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
> +#include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +
> +#undef arch_spin_is_locked
> +#undef arch_spin_is_contended
> +#undef arch_spin_value_unlocked
> +#undef arch_spin_lock
> +#undef arch_spin_trylock
> +#undef arch_spin_unlock
Perhaps you can add a macro like __no_arch_spinlock_redefine to disable
the various arch_spin_* definition in qspinlock.h and ticket_spinlock.h.
> +
> +#define COMBO_DETOUR \
> + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE( \
> + "nop", \
> + "j %l[ticket_spin_lock]", \
> + 0, \
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_XTICKETLOCK, \
> + CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS) \
> + : : : : ticket_spin_lock);
> +
> +static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + queued_spin_lock(lock);
> + return;
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + ticket_spin_lock(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + return queued_spin_trylock(lock);
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + return ticket_spin_trylock(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + queued_spin_unlock(lock);
> + return;
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + ticket_spin_unlock(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + return queued_spin_value_unlocked(lock);
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + return ticket_spin_value_unlocked(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + return queued_spin_is_locked(lock);
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + return ticket_spin_is_locked(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + COMBO_DETOUR
> + return queued_spin_is_contended(lock);
> +ticket_spin_lock:
> + return ticket_spin_is_contended(lock);
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> -#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> #else
> -#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
> #endif
>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS */
> +
> +#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index bdcf460ea53d..e65b0e54152d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,16 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR, isainfo->isa);
> set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI, isainfo->isa);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> + /*
> + * The RISC-V Linux used queued spinlock at first; then, we used ticket_lock
> + * as default or queued spinlock by choice. Because ticket_lock would dirty
> + * spinlock value, the only way is to change from queued_spinlock to
> + * ticket_spinlock, but can not be vice.
The phrase "but can not be vice" is confusing. I think you mean "but not
vice versa". Right?
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 16:46 [PATCH V10 00/19] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt/CNA qspinlock support guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 01/19] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 02/19] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 03/19] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 04/19] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-08-11 19:34 ` Waiman Long
2023-08-12 0:18 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 05/19] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2023-08-11 19:51 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-08-12 0:22 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 06/19] riscv: qspinlock: Allow force qspinlock from the command line guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 07/19] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Introduce ERRATA_THEAD_QSPINLOCK guoren
2023-08-04 9:05 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-04 9:53 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-04 10:06 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-05 1:28 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-07 5:23 ` Stefan O'Rear
2023-08-08 2:12 ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 18:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-13 19:32 ` Waiman Long
2023-09-14 3:31 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 08/19] riscv: qspinlock: Use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock() guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 09/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 10/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: " guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 11/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Implement kvm_sbi_ext_pvlock_kick_cpu() guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 12/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 13/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Remove unnecessary definitions of cmpxchg & xchg guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 14/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add xchg8 & cmpxchg_small support guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 15/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 16/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 17/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-08-02 16:47 ` [PATCH V10 18/19] locking/qspinlock: Move pv_ops into x86 directory guoren
2023-08-11 20:42 ` Waiman Long
2023-08-12 0:24 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-12 0:47 ` Waiman Long
2023-08-02 16:47 ` [PATCH V10 19/19] locking/qspinlock: riscv: Add Compact NUMA-aware lock support guoren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cc7113a-0e4e-763a-cba2-7963bcd26c7a@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).