From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 11:01:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560a84ed-7daf-4a78-a314-b867c73bce22@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511200136.3201646-1-elver@google.com>
On 5/11/26 22:00, Marco Elver wrote:
> Rework the general infrastructure around RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES into more
> flexible KMALLOC_PARTITION_CACHES, with the former being a partitioning
> mode of the latter.
>
> Introduce a new mode, KMALLOC_PARTITION_TYPED, which leverages a feature
> available in Clang 22 and later, called "allocation tokens" via
> __builtin_infer_alloc_token() [1]. Unlike KMALLOC_PARTITION_RANDOM
> (formerly RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES), this mode deterministically assigns a
> slab cache to an allocation of type T, regardless of allocation site.
>
> The builtin __builtin_infer_alloc_token(<malloc-args>, ...) instructs
> the compiler to infer an allocation type from arguments commonly passed
> to memory-allocating functions and returns a type-derived token ID. The
> implementation passes kmalloc-args to the builtin: the compiler performs
> best-effort type inference, and then recognizes common patterns such as
> `kmalloc(sizeof(T), ...)`, `kmalloc(sizeof(T) * n, ...)`, but also
> `(T *)kmalloc(...)`. Where the compiler fails to infer a type the
> fallback token (default: 0) is chosen.
>
> Note: kmalloc_obj(..) APIs fix the pattern how size and result type are
> expressed, and therefore ensures there's not much drift in which
> patterns the compiler needs to recognize. Specifically, kmalloc_obj()
> and friends expand to `(TYPE *)KMALLOC(__obj_size, GFP)`, which the
> compiler recognizes via the cast to TYPE*.
>
> Clang's default token ID calculation is described as [1]:
>
> typehashpointersplit: This mode assigns a token ID based on the hash
> of the allocated type's name, where the top half ID-space is reserved
> for types that contain pointers and the bottom half for types that do
> not contain pointers.
>
> Separating pointer-containing objects from pointerless objects and data
> allocations can help mitigate certain classes of memory corruption
> exploits [2]: attackers who gains a buffer overflow on a primitive
> buffer cannot use it to directly corrupt pointers or other critical
> metadata in an object residing in a different, isolated heap region.
>
> It is important to note that heap isolation strategies offer a
> best-effort approach, and do not provide a 100% security guarantee,
> albeit achievable at relatively low performance cost. Note that this
> also does not prevent cross-cache attacks: while waiting for future
> features like SLAB_VIRTUAL [3] to provide physical page isolation, this
> feature should be deployed alongside SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR and
> init_on_free=1 to mitigate cross-cache attacks and page-reuse attacks as
> much as possible today.
>
> With all that, my kernel (x86 defconfig) shows me a histogram of slab
> cache object distribution per /proc/slabinfo (after boot):
>
> <slab cache> <objs> <hist>
> kmalloc-part-15 1465 ++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-14 2988 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-13 1656 ++++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-12 1045 ++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-11 1697 ++++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-10 1489 ++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-09 965 +++++++++
> kmalloc-part-08 710 +++++++
> kmalloc-part-07 100 +
> kmalloc-part-06 217 ++
> kmalloc-part-05 105 +
> kmalloc-part-04 4047 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kmalloc-part-03 183 +
> kmalloc-part-02 283 ++
> kmalloc-part-01 316 +++
> kmalloc 1422 ++++++++++++++
>
> The above /proc/slabinfo snapshot shows me there are 6673 allocated
> objects (slabs 00 - 07) that the compiler claims contain no pointers or
> it was unable to infer the type of, and 12015 objects that contain
> pointers (slabs 08 - 15). On a whole, this looks relatively sane.
>
> Additionally, when I compile my kernel with -Rpass=alloc-token, which
> provides diagnostics where (after dead-code elimination) type inference
> failed, I see 186 allocation sites where the compiler failed to identify
> a type (down from 966 when I sent the RFC [4]). Some initial review
> confirms these are mostly variable sized buffers, but also include
> structs with trailing flexible length arrays.
>
> Link: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AllocToken.html [1]
> Link: https://blog.dfsec.com/ios/2025/05/30/blasting-past-ios-18/ [2]
> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/944647/ [3]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250825154505.1558444-1-elver@google.com/ [4]
> Link: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-a-framework-for-allocator-partitioning-hints/87434
> Acked-by: GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
> Co-developed-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Applied [1] to slab/for-next, thanks. That means including the kernel-doc
workarounds in patch 3. I know Jon said someone might hate it, but maybe it
will motivate them for creating a proper fix :) It seems better than leaving
doc generation broken or not applying this series at all.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/log/?h=slab/for-7.2/alloc_token
I did the following fixup to remove passing an unnecessary NULL argument for
__kmalloc_nolock() with buckets enabled. Made bloat-o-meter happier a bit.
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index c232f8a10af6..795455256329 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_sheaf_size(struct slab_sheaf *sheaf);
* with the exception of kunit tests
*/
-void *__kmalloc_noprof(DECL_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, b, token), gfp_t flags)
+void *__kmalloc_noprof(DECL_TOKEN_PARAMS(size, token), gfp_t flags)
__assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1);
void *__kmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, b, token), gfp_t flags, int node)
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *_kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t
kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags, token)][index],
flags, size);
}
- return __kmalloc_noprof(PASS_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, NULL, token), flags);
+ return __kmalloc_noprof(PASS_TOKEN_PARAMS(size, token), flags);
}
#define kmalloc_noprof(...) _kmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, __kmalloc_token(__VA_ARGS__))
#define kmalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index a6e9015601d6..74652bbdd591 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -5303,10 +5303,10 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, b, token), gfp_t flags, in
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc_node_noprof);
-void *__kmalloc_noprof(DECL_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, b, token), gfp_t flags)
+void *__kmalloc_noprof(DECL_TOKEN_PARAMS(size, token), gfp_t flags)
{
- return __do_kmalloc_node(size, PASS_BUCKET_PARAM(b), flags,
- NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_, PASS_TOKEN_PARAM(token));
+ return __do_kmalloc_node(size, NULL, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_,
+ PASS_TOKEN_PARAM(token));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc_noprof);
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260511200136.3201646-1-elver@google.com>
2026-05-14 9:01 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-05-14 10:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning Harry Yoo (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560a84ed-7daf-4a78-a314-b867c73bce22@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=matteorizzo@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox