From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, sorganov@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] docs: networking: timestamping: add one more known issue
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:08:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5af0fd85-9e09-e5a2-fc99-d72b8a31cc0d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717161027.1408240-3-olteanv@gmail.com>
On 7/17/2020 9:10 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Document the fact that Ethernet PHY timestamping has a fundamentally
> flawed corner case (which in fact hits the majority of networking
> drivers): a PHY for which its host MAC driver doesn't forward the
> phy_mii_ioctl for timestamping is still going to be presented to user
> space as functional.
>
> Fixing this inconsistency would require moving the phy_has_tsinfo()
> check inside all MAC drivers which are capable of PHY timestamping, to
> be in harmony with the existing design for phy_has_hwtstamp() checks.
> Instead of doing that, document the preferable solution which is that
> offending MAC drivers be fixed instead.
This statement feels weird. Aren't you documenting that the preferable
solution is? I.e. "Document this preferable solution: Fix the offending
MAC driver"
Or am I misunderstanding what the issue is here?
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> index 9a1f4cb4ce9e..4004c5d2771d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> @@ -754,3 +754,40 @@ check in their "TX confirmation" portion, not only for
> that PTP timestamping is not enabled for anything other than the outermost PHC,
> this enhanced check will avoid delivering a duplicated TX timestamp to user
> space.
> +
> +Another known limitation is the design of the ``__ethtool_get_ts_info``
> +function::
> +
> + int __ethtool_get_ts_info(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_ts_info *info)
> + {
> + const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> + struct phy_device *phydev = dev->phydev;
> +
> + memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> + info->cmd = ETHTOOL_GET_TS_INFO;
> +
> + if (phy_has_tsinfo(phydev))
> + return phy_ts_info(phydev, info);
> + if (ops->get_ts_info)
> + return ops->get_ts_info(dev, info);
> +
> + info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
> + info->phc_index = -1;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> +Because the generic function searches first for the timestamping capabilities
> +of the attached PHY, and returns them directly without consulting the MAC
> +driver, no checking is being done whether the requirements described in `3.2.2
> +Ethernet PHYs`_ are implemented or not. Therefore, if the MAC driver does not
> +satisfy the requirements for PHY timestamping, and
> +``CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING`` is enabled, then a non-functional PHC index
> +(the one corresponding to the PHY) will be reported to user space, via
> +``ethtool -T``.
> +
> +The correct solution to this problem is to implement the PHY timestamping
> +requirements in the MAC driver found broken, and submit as a bug fix patch to
> +netdev@vger.kernel.org. See :ref:`Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> +<stable_kernel_rules>` for more details.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 16:10 [PATCH net-next 0/3] Document more PTP timestamping known quirks Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] docs: networking: timestamping: rename last section to "Known bugs" Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 22:05 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-17 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] docs: networking: timestamping: add one more known issue Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 23:08 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2020-07-18 11:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] docs: networking: timestamping: add a set of frequently asked questions Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 23:12 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-18 11:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-20 18:54 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-20 21:05 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-20 21:45 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-20 22:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-21 0:21 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-21 19:51 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-22 3:25 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-25 21:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-21 17:16 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-21 0:15 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-17 21:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] Document more PTP timestamping known quirks Sergey Organov
2020-07-17 21:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-17 23:13 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-18 10:54 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-18 11:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-18 13:35 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-18 11:21 ` Sergey Organov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5af0fd85-9e09-e5a2-fc99-d72b8a31cc0d@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sorganov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).