linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix SPTE encoding of MMIO generation upper half
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:08:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e1dc1cd-b175-86be-b33e-0456ecbd50e8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X8/sWzYUjuEYwCuf@google.com>

On 08/12/20 22:12, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK               GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS + MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS - 1, 0)
> What if we leave MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK as is, GENMASK_ULL(17, 0), and instead add a
> BUILD_BUG_ON() to assert that it matches the above logic?  It's really easy to
> get lost when reading through the chain of defines, I find the explicit mask
> helps provide an anchor/reference for understand what's going on.  It'll require
> an update if/when PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT, but that's not necessarily a bad
> thing, e.g. the comment above this block will also be stale.

Sounds good.

Paolo


      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-05  0:48 [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix SPTE encoding of MMIO generation upper half Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-12-06 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-06 15:53   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-12-08 21:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-09  9:08     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e1dc1cd-b175-86be-b33e-0456ecbd50e8@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).