From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <kuurtb@gmail.com>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <vkoul@kernel.org>,
<yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>, <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<dakr@kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com>, <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] sysfs: Introduce macros to simplify creation of visible attribute groups
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:32:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <680994c499125_71fe294d3@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423175040.784680-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
David E. Box wrote:
> Introduce macros to reduce boilerplate in attribute group definitions.
> Combine DEFINE_SYSFS_ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_[COMBO]_VISIBILITY() with attribute
> definitions in order to simplify group declarations involving visibility
> logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sysfs.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> index 00dc88776f21..0804bffd6013 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> @@ -303,6 +303,30 @@ static const struct attribute_group _name##_group = { \
> }; \
> __ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(_name)
>
> +#define NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_VISIBLE(_name) \
> +DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBILITY(_name); \
> +static const struct attribute_group _name##_group = { \
> + .name = __stringify(_name), \
> + .attrs = _name##_attrs, \
> + .is_visible = SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(_name), \
> +}
> +
> +#define NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS_VISIBLE(_name) \
> +NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_VISIBLE(_name); \
> +__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(_name)
> +
> +#define NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_COMBO_VISIBLE(_name) \
> +DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_COMBO_VISIBILITY(_name); \
> +static const struct attribute_group _name##_group = { \
> + .name = __stringify(_name), \
> + .attrs = _name##_attrs, \
> + .is_visible = SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(_name), \
> +}
> +
> +#define NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS_COMBO_VISIBLE(_name) \
> +NAMED_ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_COMBO_VISIBLE(_name); \
> +__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(_name)
> +
Looks good to me, I like that this makes clear that it is setting {
.name } in the resulting group.
I would not mind a comment like "See DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_COMBO_VISIBILITY
for method definition requirements", but only add that as a follow-on
patch if someone else acks that idea.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 17:50 [PATCH 0/7] sysfs: Introduce macros for attribute groups with visibility control David E. Box
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/7] sysfs: Rename attribute group visibility macros David E. Box
2025-04-24 1:26 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/7] sysfs: Introduce macros to simplify creation of visible attribute groups David E. Box
2025-04-24 1:32 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] docs: sysfs.rst: document additional attribute group macros David E. Box
2025-04-24 1:34 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] pci: doe: Replace sysfs visibility macro David E. Box
2025-04-24 1:35 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-25 10:57 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-25 18:13 ` David E. Box
2025-04-26 13:06 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] soundwire: sysfs: Use ATTRIBUTE_GROUP_VISIBLE() David E. Box
2025-04-24 1:37 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] platform/x86/dell: alienware-wmi: update sysfs visibility macros David E. Box
2025-04-23 18:31 ` Kurt Borja
2025-04-24 3:01 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-23 17:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] sysfs: Remove transitional attribute group alias macros David E. Box
2025-04-24 3:02 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=680994c499125_71fe294d3@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kuurtb@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox