From: Anvesh Jain P <anvesh.p@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Birk Skyum <birk.skyum@pm.me>
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org,
"Sibi Sankar" <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Daniel J Blueman" <daniel@quora.org>,
"Maya Matuszczyk" <maccraft123mc@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: monitor Slim 7x legacy sensors
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:28:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <695a5c15-9028-4b7e-8e37-b2e08ad1fb93@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908143650.30134-1-birk.skyum@pm.me>
On 9/8/2026 8:06 PM, Birk Skyum wrote:
> Hi Anvesh,
>
> Sashiko flagged the pre-existing SCI cleanup gap on the reference-board
> probe path. I reproduced it in KUnit with simulated I2C and IRQ devices:
> when the thermal-capability read fails, SCI remains enabled after the
> driver core releases the interrupt.
>
> I noticed you already proposed the devm_add_action_or_reset() conversion
> and agreed to split it out after Konrad's review:
> https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2607.3/10628.html
>
> With that conversion applied locally, the failure-path and removal tests
> pass. Is there a standalone version available to test? Happy to share the
> reproducer if useful. I'll keep this separate from the Yoga sensor RFC.
>
> For the other v2 findings, I've queued the named I2C initializers for the
> next revision. Guenter left the driver split to me, and v2 already moved
> the documentation out of Documentation/hwmon as requested.
>
> Thanks,
> Birk
Hi Birk,
Yes, we already have that fix, SCI disable is now registered as a devm
action right after it's enabled in probe, so it unwinds on any probe
failure, not just on remove(). Same for the i2c_device_id
named-initializer thing bot flagged.
I'm working on v2 right now. Once I get consensus on all the review
comments, I'll post it with these fixes included very soon, once it's
out so you can test against your reproducer.
--
Best Regards,
Anvesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 13:58 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Monitor Yoga Slim 7x EC sensors without taking over cooling Birk Skyum
2026-09-08 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: monitor Slim 7x legacy sensors Birk Skyum
[not found] ` <20260908140849.229ED1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-08 14:36 ` Birk Skyum
2026-09-09 4:58 ` Anvesh Jain P [this message]
2026-09-08 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: test sensor and variant handling Birk Skyum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=695a5c15-9028-4b7e-8e37-b2e08ad1fb93@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=anvesh.p@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=birk.skyum@pm.me \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@quora.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maccraft123mc@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox