From: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scripts: kernel-doc: reduce repeated regex expressions into variables
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:27:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f76ddcb-7076-4c91-9c4c-995002c4cb91@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423132117.GB235567@casper.infradead.org>
On 23/4/21 6:51 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:48:39AM +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>> +my $pointer_function = qr{([^\(]*\(\*)\s*\)\s*\(([^\)]*)\)};
>
> Is that a pointer-to-function? Or as people who write C usually call it,
> a function pointer? Wouldn't it be better to call it $function_pointer?
>
Will do it.
>> @@ -1210,8 +1211,14 @@ sub dump_struct($$) {
>> my $decl_type;
>> my $members;
>> my $type = qr{struct|union};
>> + my $packed = qr{__packed};
>> + my $aligned = qr{__aligned};
>> + my $cacheline_aligned_in_smp = qr{____cacheline_aligned_in_smp};
>> + my $cacheline_aligned = qr{____cacheline_aligned};
>
> I don't think those four definitions actually simplify anything.
>
>> + my $attribute = qr{__attribute__\s*\(\([a-z0-9,_\*\s\(\)]*\)\)}i;
>
> ... whereas this one definitely does.
>
>> - $members =~ s/\s*__attribute__\s*\(\([a-z0-9,_\*\s\(\)]*\)\)/ /gi;
>> - $members =~ s/\s*__aligned\s*\([^;]*\)/ /gos;
>> - $members =~ s/\s*__packed\s*/ /gos;
>> + $members =~ s/\s*$attribute/ /gi;
>> + $members =~ s/\s*$aligned\s*\([^;]*\)/ /gos;
>
> Maybe put the \s*\([^;]*\) into $aligned? Then it becomes a useful
> abstraction.
Actually, I had made these variables as they were repeated here and at
- my $definition_body =
qr{\{(.*)\}(?:\s*(?:__packed|__aligned|____cacheline_aligned_in_smp|____cacheline_aligned|__attribute__\s*\(\([a-z0-9,_\s\(\)]*\)\)))*};
+ my $definition_body =
qr{\{(.*)\}(?:\s*(?:$packed|$aligned|$cacheline_aligned_in_smp|$cacheline_aligned|$attribute))*};
So, defining them at a place might help.
What do you think?
>
>> - } elsif ($prototype =~ m/^()([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\(]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^()([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/ ||
>> - $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+\s*\w+\s*\*+\s*)\s*([a-zA-Z0-9_~:]+)\s*\(([^\{]*)\)/) {
>> + } elsif ($prototype =~ m/^()($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end1/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^()($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+)\s+($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end2/ ||
>> + $prototype =~ m/^(\w+\s+\w+\s*\*+\s*\w+\s*\*+\s*)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end2/) {
>
> This is probably the best patch I've seen so far this year.
>
> Now, can we go further? For example:
> $prototype_end = $prototype_end1|$prototype_end2
> That would let us cut the number of lines here in half.
> > Can we create a definition for a variable number of \w and \s and '*'
> in the return type? In fact, can we define a regex that matches a type?
> So this would become:
>
>> + } elsif ($prototype =~ m/^($type)\s*($name)\s*$prototype_end/) {
>
I have been able to reduce these expressions furthermore. Will send a
v2 in few..
Thanks
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-24 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 19:18 [RFC] scripts: kernel-doc: reduce repeated regex expressions into variables Aditya Srivastava
[not found] ` <CAKXUXMx9q57cWXkcezKKo-uuh21Sd-Si9M9KydzFEMQ0ELYEng@mail.gmail.com>
2021-04-23 12:20 ` Aditya Srivastava
2021-04-23 13:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-24 11:57 ` Aditya Srivastava [this message]
2021-04-24 12:47 ` [RFC v2] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-04-27 15:55 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-04-27 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-29 6:37 ` [RFC v3] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-04-29 23:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-04-30 2:03 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-01 9:30 ` Aditya Srivastava
2021-05-01 15:03 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-05-14 14:42 ` [RFC v4] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-05-14 15:10 ` Aditya Srivastava
2021-05-17 17:49 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-05-01 15:43 ` [RFC v3] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-14 16:17 ` Aditya Srivastava
2021-04-26 17:31 ` [RFC] " Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f76ddcb-7076-4c91-9c4c-995002c4cb91@gmail.com \
--to=yashsri421@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).