From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/13] coresight: Allow setting the timestamp interval
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:09:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <718ffc8b-21ec-4536-b0c4-aaf2635aaf75@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ9a7VgqGJ=YLG6+ypMnqV9YJ_dMBw6qyhusXdR_NR2=RTis-w@mail.gmail.com>
On 27/11/2025 3:48 pm, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi James
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 10:57, James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Timestamps are currently emitted at the maximum rate possible, which is
>> much too frequent for most use cases. Set the interval using the value
>> from the timestamp field. Granular control is not required, so save
>> space in the config by interpreting it as 2 ^ timestamp. And then 4
>> bits (0 - 15) is enough to set the interval to be larger than the
>> existing SYNC timestamp interval.
>>
>> No sysfs mode support is needed for this attribute because counter
>> generated timestamps are only configured for Perf mode.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h | 1 +
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> index 24d929428633..128f80bb1443 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #ifndef _CORESIGHT_ETM_PERF_H
>> #define _CORESIGHT_ETM_PERF_H
>>
>> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>> #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
>> #include "coresight-priv.h"
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> index c7bf73c8f2d7..0129b0502726 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static void etm4_enable_sysfs_smp_call(void *info)
>> * +--------------+
>> * |
>> * +------v-------+
>> - * | Counter x | (reload to 1 on underflow)
>> + * | Counter x | (reload to 2 ^ timestamp on underflow)
>> * +--------------+
>> * |
>> * +------v--------------+
>> @@ -662,11 +662,25 @@ static void etm4_enable_sysfs_smp_call(void *info)
>> * | Timestamp Generator | (timestamp on resource y)
>> * +----------------------+
>> */
>> -static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
>> + struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>> {
>> int ctridx;
>> int rselector;
>> struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config;
>> + struct perf_event_attr max_timestamp = {
>> + .ATTR_CFG_FLD_timestamp_CFG = U64_MAX,
>> + };
>> +
>> + /* timestamp may be 0 if deprecated_timestamp is used, so make min 1 */
>> + u8 ts_level = max(1, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, timestamp));
>> +
>
> I could be missing something here - but if we have a perf command line:
>
> perf -e cs_etm/timestamp=0/
>
> is this bit not changing that to timestamp=1 regardless? The docs
> (patch 13) indicate timestamp=0 to be timestamps off.
>
> This command is used in test_arm_coresight.sh when testing the
> combination of options on the CS system.
>
> Mike
>
No, no change. This function never gets called if either timestamp or
deprecated_timestamp = 0.
timestamp=0 and timestamp=1 still behave exactly the same as before. The
only new change is timestamp values > 1 and that the bits used in the
config are different.
>> + /*
>> + * Disable counter generated timestamps when timestamp == MAX. Leave
>> + * only SYNC timestamps.
>> + */
>> + if (ts_level == ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(&max_timestamp, timestamp))
>> + return 0;
>>
>> /* No point in trying if we don't have at least one counter */
>> if (!drvdata->nr_cntr)
>> @@ -704,12 +718,8 @@ static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> return -ENOSPC;
>> }
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Initialise original and reload counter value to the smallest
>> - * possible value in order to get as much precision as we can.
>> - */
>> - config->cntr_val[ctridx] = 1;
>> - config->cntrldvr[ctridx] = 1;
>> + /* Initialise original and reload counter value. */
>> + config->cntr_val[ctridx] = config->cntrldvr[ctridx] = 1 << (ts_level - 1);
>>
>> /*
>> * Trace Counter Control Register TRCCNTCTLRn
>> @@ -799,7 +809,7 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>> * order to correlate instructions executed on different CPUs
>> * (CPU-wide trace scenarios).
>> */
>> - ret = etm4_config_timestamp_event(drvdata);
>> + ret = etm4_config_timestamp_event(drvdata, attr);
>>
>> /*
>> * No need to go further if timestamp intervals can't
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 10:54 [PATCH v7 00/13] coresight: Update timestamp attribute to be an interval instead of bool James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] coresight: Change syncfreq to be a u8 James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] coresight: Repack struct etmv4_drvdata James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] coresight: Refactor etm4_config_timestamp_event() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] coresight: Hide unused ETMv3 format attributes James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] coresight: Define format attributes with GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] coresight: Interpret ETMv3 config with ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] coresight: Don't reject unrecognized ETMv3 format attributes James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] coresight: Interpret perf config with ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] coresight: Interpret ETMv4 " James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] coresight: Remove misleading definitions James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] coresight: Extend width of timestamp format attribute James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] coresight: Allow setting the timestamp interval James Clark
2025-11-27 2:27 ` Jie Gan
2025-11-27 15:48 ` Mike Leach
2025-11-27 16:09 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-11-27 16:11 ` Mike Leach
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] coresight: docs: Document etm4x timestamp interval option James Clark
2025-11-26 14:01 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 14:20 ` Mike Leach
2025-11-26 14:44 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 15:08 ` James Clark
2025-11-26 15:36 ` Al Grant
2025-11-27 10:32 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 15:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 14:00 ` [PATCH v7 00/13] coresight: Update timestamp attribute to be an interval instead of bool Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=718ffc8b-21ec-4536-b0c4-aaf2635aaf75@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).