linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/13] coresight: Allow setting the timestamp interval
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:09:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <718ffc8b-21ec-4536-b0c4-aaf2635aaf75@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ9a7VgqGJ=YLG6+ypMnqV9YJ_dMBw6qyhusXdR_NR2=RTis-w@mail.gmail.com>



On 27/11/2025 3:48 pm, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi James
> 
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 10:57, James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Timestamps are currently emitted at the maximum rate possible, which is
>> much too frequent for most use cases. Set the interval using the value
>> from the timestamp field. Granular control is not required, so save
>> space in the config by interpreting it as 2 ^ timestamp. And then 4
>> bits (0 - 15) is enough to set the interval to be larger than the
>> existing SYNC timestamp interval.
>>
>> No sysfs mode support is needed for this attribute because counter
>> generated timestamps are only configured for Perf mode.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h   |  1 +
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------
>>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> index 24d929428633..128f80bb1443 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>   #ifndef _CORESIGHT_ETM_PERF_H
>>   #define _CORESIGHT_ETM_PERF_H
>>
>> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>>   #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
>>   #include "coresight-priv.h"
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> index c7bf73c8f2d7..0129b0502726 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static void etm4_enable_sysfs_smp_call(void *info)
>>    *  +--------------+
>>    *         |
>>    *  +------v-------+
>> - *  | Counter x    |   (reload to 1 on underflow)
>> + *  | Counter x    |   (reload to 2 ^ timestamp on underflow)
>>    *  +--------------+
>>    *         |
>>    *  +------v--------------+
>> @@ -662,11 +662,25 @@ static void etm4_enable_sysfs_smp_call(void *info)
>>    *  | Timestamp Generator  |  (timestamp on resource y)
>>    *  +----------------------+
>>    */
>> -static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
>> +                                      struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>>   {
>>          int ctridx;
>>          int rselector;
>>          struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config;
>> +       struct perf_event_attr max_timestamp = {
>> +               .ATTR_CFG_FLD_timestamp_CFG = U64_MAX,
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       /* timestamp may be 0 if deprecated_timestamp is used, so make min 1 */
>> +       u8 ts_level = max(1, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, timestamp));
>> +
> 
> I could be missing something here - but if we have a perf command line:
> 
> perf -e cs_etm/timestamp=0/
> 
> is this bit not changing that to timestamp=1 regardless? The docs
> (patch 13) indicate timestamp=0 to be timestamps off.
> 
> This command is used in test_arm_coresight.sh when testing the
> combination of options on the CS system.
> 
> Mike
> 

No, no change. This function never gets called if either timestamp or 
deprecated_timestamp = 0.

timestamp=0 and timestamp=1 still behave exactly the same as before. The 
only new change is timestamp values > 1 and that the bits used in the 
config are different.

>> +       /*
>> +        * Disable counter generated timestamps when timestamp == MAX. Leave
>> +        * only SYNC timestamps.
>> +        */
>> +       if (ts_level == ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(&max_timestamp, timestamp))
>> +               return 0;
>>
>>          /* No point in trying if we don't have at least one counter */
>>          if (!drvdata->nr_cntr)
>> @@ -704,12 +718,8 @@ static int etm4_config_timestamp_event(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>>                  return -ENOSPC;
>>          }
>>
>> -       /*
>> -        * Initialise original and reload counter value to the smallest
>> -        * possible value in order to get as much precision as we can.
>> -        */
>> -       config->cntr_val[ctridx] = 1;
>> -       config->cntrldvr[ctridx] = 1;
>> +       /* Initialise original and reload counter value. */
>> +       config->cntr_val[ctridx] = config->cntrldvr[ctridx] = 1 << (ts_level - 1);
>>
>>          /*
>>           * Trace Counter Control Register TRCCNTCTLRn
>> @@ -799,7 +809,7 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>                   * order to correlate instructions executed on different CPUs
>>                   * (CPU-wide trace scenarios).
>>                   */
>> -               ret = etm4_config_timestamp_event(drvdata);
>> +               ret = etm4_config_timestamp_event(drvdata, attr);
>>
>>                  /*
>>                   * No need to go further if timestamp intervals can't
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-27 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-26 10:54 [PATCH v7 00/13] coresight: Update timestamp attribute to be an interval instead of bool James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] coresight: Change syncfreq to be a u8 James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] coresight: Repack struct etmv4_drvdata James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] coresight: Refactor etm4_config_timestamp_event() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] coresight: Hide unused ETMv3 format attributes James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] coresight: Define format attributes with GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] coresight: Interpret ETMv3 config with ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] coresight: Don't reject unrecognized ETMv3 format attributes James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] coresight: Interpret perf config with ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD() James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] coresight: Interpret ETMv4 " James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] coresight: Remove misleading definitions James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] coresight: Extend width of timestamp format attribute James Clark
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] coresight: Allow setting the timestamp interval James Clark
2025-11-27  2:27   ` Jie Gan
2025-11-27 15:48   ` Mike Leach
2025-11-27 16:09     ` James Clark [this message]
2025-11-27 16:11     ` Mike Leach
2025-11-26 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] coresight: docs: Document etm4x timestamp interval option James Clark
2025-11-26 14:01   ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 14:20     ` Mike Leach
2025-11-26 14:44       ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 15:08         ` James Clark
2025-11-26 15:36           ` Al Grant
2025-11-27 10:32             ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 15:14         ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 14:00 ` [PATCH v7 00/13] coresight: Update timestamp attribute to be an interval instead of bool Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=718ffc8b-21ec-4536-b0c4-aaf2635aaf75@linaro.org \
    --to=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).