From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03734BCADD; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778010792; cv=none; b=jVSFtXgC6N7uH+K9Ry92s6trHqwhrBPe6u6LaPwYIFa1pGDHcfoozLwetpCbaVhlMDm7Ehi1AbWcoo9RXwjAIbeRlqQ0cxOkx/yU7J0jgzPX2j0z9H8HEHyDCI9D3C1PWIv4HbPJW7+F4ntvC8jEemP3m0kUpBIBl0UKO8TPZGU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778010792; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CxaCW3SztSa6uVryY2jTfZoS2WTsbMf8c+SG6cLKv1w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=bjMgt1iYan6BC0gOwq0R/Yw1iEUtHQqsGVk+/j3BtAuXtgig8xDkPJduJ1wZ/QveOVHCAHuZoCE6YH0rSTwKxC1DgVnrrKh6y8NX0jUIhJRyYqSa9f6ThJsjvmE1TraNAslWZ6zC9EHTuE7+JkK8JGnDMvUD8GUc9QjqoT5Guus= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=15IS1GSy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="15IS1GSy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=G8itzf8Jflt0Ma/iCT1AnAHkLO/HOilqQqAeS0XCM+U=; b=15IS1GSyhzFSvPhxU1034sAYFj 0zOrPp/3W5wzDxzxJR5TpBoMnIhP+Zi4Q25Tg4ZoIhRg6xcLP+93jPN/k6nf1ng3OVmtE88HXyjn2 zo2C8S2hdbVZvHTrAlCltrIjHEv6xrfRDsDssAqJYeaHmtzQfy1qnGMNHKuD66MgqWGYE2JRNULHH /+51gWC1vyFZJzoVzMbNArcsOE7lcRX2VJNvJN09JU2KhyLIEE5pgPQabMqF3Ag/tfaVhRlBlyhA3 rQlm/KddivqoG4vduHdVdge3JBrENrFcxWXQ9dw6N4D/JKI1KFrinMJWMJ8JQE3B3saqt/ttJ7uFV JF87T0/g==; Received: from [50.53.43.113] (helo=[192.168.254.34]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wKLpG-0000000HLeT-1tFV; Tue, 05 May 2026 19:53:02 +0000 Message-ID: <72626637-2ed7-40c6-b5fb-75664e59e377@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 12:53:01 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] docs: maintainers_include: clean most SPHINXDIRS=process warnings To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan References: Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/5/26 6:25 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > building docs with SPHINXDIRS=process is too noisy, as it > generates lots of undefined refs. Fixing it is easy: just let > linkify generate html URLs for the broken links when SPHINXDIRS > is used. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Is this specific to SPHINXDIRS=process? I don't see anything here checking for "process". If this is process-specific, why? Or is it just for SPHINXDIRS=""? > --- > Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py | 44 +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- ~Randy