linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:49:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7269d265-154b-e79a-2622-287e149d85ad@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601030144.3458136-2-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>

On 2023-06-01 04:01, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
> by the PMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>   drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
>   drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index a3f1c410b417..88547a2b73e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -701,8 +701,12 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 val)
>   
>   	if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
>   		offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
> -
> -		writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> +		if (!cspmu->impl.split_64bit_access) {

Could we not just hang this off the 64-bit atomicity property to match 
the read path? It doesn't seem like there's much benefit in 
micro-optimising for whether the interconnect splits 64-bit accesses 
into 32-bit bursts vs. just not accepting them at all.

> +			writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> +		} else {
> +			writel(lower_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset);
> +			writel(upper_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset + 4);

lo_hi_writeq() - the header's already included for 32-bit build 
coverage, so we may as well put it to use :)

Thanks,
Robin.

> +		}
>   	} else {
>   		offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 51323b175a4a..c0412cf2bd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
>   /* Vendor/implementer descriptor. */
>   struct arm_cspmu_impl {
>   	u32 pmiidr;
> +	bool split_64bit_access;
>   	struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops ops;
>   	void *ctx;
>   };

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  3:01 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 14:49   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-06-02  6:47     ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support shared interrupts Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 14:54   ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02  7:04     ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 11:25       ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-01  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific event validation Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 15:09   ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02  7:09     ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 15:23   ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02  7:13     ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 11:51       ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-03  1:16   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7269d265-154b-e79a-2622-287e149d85ad@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).