Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs: i2c: summary: rephrase paragraph explaining the figure

[Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>]

On 6/7/2024 4:17 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Use 'controller/target' and 'adapter/client' pairs consistently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> index b10b6aaafcec..1b5bc7ed46aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ in a directory specific to the feature they provide, for example
>  ``drivers/media/gpio/`` for GPIO expanders and ``drivers/media/i2c/`` for
>  video-related chips.
>  
> -For the example configuration in figure, you will need a driver for your
> -I2C adapter, and drivers for your I2C devices (usually one driver for each
> -device).
> +For the example configuration in the figure above, you will need one adapter
> +driver for the I2C controller, and client drivers for your I2C targets. Usually
> +one driver for each client.
>  
>  Outdated terminology
>  --------------------

Similar feedback as for patch 4. I thought we agreed on using {local,
remote} target for in-line clarity.

Thanks,
Easwar