From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF779EB64D7 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 03:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230033AbjFTDy1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:54:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230262AbjFTDyX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:54:23 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0112710D2; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 20:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624D35C01BF; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:54:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:54:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-id:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1687233261; x= 1687319661; bh=R9f3a1o9mdbc+HYYy6GLvEOqJb10bmncA9C0HjKJ42s=; b=B S+tlmoB+GwsMwSq396SS8fRfAsjI0qmSAkvr/azBgDpPofSkvogMGqbPRyr6n+F+ eHcw+GBwrayo8FPEJb4MzGCPE2/wSuGPcFNZ2g6DrrkFGUfqPMBPXQ9CBflv0Ex3 L0DG3UibXmPWMutojuN3RWGFONaz57VMBYr1TRM9Bnp9vItEU6w3R2ju23kBledF Z4yMXCjIbe1WLhsG9sUxOzzTFFEnPcEp5mvxsCHiTMJdbX/tkSmH5CDKVwgPMGTh cNhENQe1k2gcAhGAV46mqFrWJj0v60dxqVwlxPXoTLAJUc+YcVeCS8nVdg8EZiRX ZxGKiih9aUmAoxXQVKtVg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgeefgedgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevufgjkfhfgggtsehmtderredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhnnhcu vfhhrghinhcuoehfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelfeeklefggfetkedukeevfffgvdeuheetffekledtfeejteelieejteeh geelieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i58a146ae:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:54:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:54:37 +1000 (AEST) From: Finn Thain To: Kees Cook cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, Theodore Ts'o , Dan Williams , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Linux Contribution Maturity Model and the wider community In-Reply-To: <202306191247.3CA085BA64@keescook> Message-ID: <7f26d19e-2aed-c03f-e59c-c36164cdfb19@linux-m68k.org> References: <202306191247.3CA085BA64@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="-1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354" Content-ID: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: <833f7255-6cf7-1760-8087-49cb24a6c819@nippy.intranet> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Kees Cook wrote: > > @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ Level 5 > > =20 > > * Upstream kernel development is considered a formal job position, wit= h > > at least a third of the engineer=E2=80=99s time spent doing Upstream= Work. > > -* Organizations will actively seek out community member feedback as a > > - factor in official performance reviews. >=20 > This really cannot be dropped -- companies must factor upstream work=20 > into performance reviews or it will continue to be seen as "free time"=20 > work, and employees won't be recognized for their upstream=20 > contributions. If an org has no perf reviews, this item is already=20 > nullified, IMO. >=20 I believe that I've now addressed this in my reply to Greg. ---1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354--