From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 15:23:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82963fe6-e908-4c1a-b963-ac1ab86f2bdc@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028-keyupdate-rfc-v2-4-eb5143b4c487@gmail.com>
On 10/28/26 2:52 PM, Martin Belanger via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
>
> RFC 9846 section 5.5 requires a key update before the key reaches its
> usage limit, 2^24.5 full-size records for AES-GCM. The limit counts
> records, and only the record layer knows where records start and end.
> Section 4.7.3 also requires a reply to a KeyUpdate with
> update_requested, sent before the next Application Data record. Both
> need a KeyUpdate at an exact position in the record stream.
>
> For a socket with a registered TX secret, send a KeyUpdate before the
> next record when the key has protected 2^24 records, as GnuTLS does,
> or when the peer asked for one. ChaCha20-Poly1305 has no record limit.
> The KeyUpdate is sent as a handshake record, which closes the open data
> record first. Pending encryptions are then completed, and only then is
> the next key installed.
>
> Add TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE to send a KeyUpdate now, optionally asking the
> peer to update too. It can only bring a KeyUpdate forward: the record
> limit is enforced either way. Following section 4.7.3, a new request
> to the peer waits for the answer to the previous one, and no more than
> 2^48-1 epochs are used.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/tls.rst | 17 +++++
> include/net/tls.h | 5 +-
> include/uapi/linux/tls.h | 1 +
> net/tls/tls.h | 1 +
> net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c | 5 ++
> net/tls/tls_main.c | 38 +++++++++-
> net/tls/tls_sw.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 7 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> index 2e011bd1ce4a..69752a6d67df 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> @@ -326,6 +326,23 @@ direction is then left to the application again.
>
> The secrets cannot be read back.
>
> +With a registered TX secret, the kernel sends a KeyUpdate before the key
> +reaches its record limit (RFC 9846, section 5.5): after 2^24 records, except
> +for ChaCha20-Poly1305, which has no limit. It also sends one before the next
> +record when a received KeyUpdate asks for it. With a registered RX secret,
> +the kernel processes a received KeyUpdate and does not pass the record to
> +the application. A peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in one second ends
> +the connection.
> +
> +TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +TLS 1.3 only. Send a KeyUpdate now and install the next TX key. Needs a
> +registered TX secret. The value is an ``int``: 0 to send a KeyUpdate, 1 to
> +also ask the peer to update its key. Asking the peer needs a registered RX
> +secret, and fails with ``EBUSY`` until the peer has answered the previous
> +request.
> +
> Statistics
> ==========
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
> index a5bc28a7d1f5..d3123b17030c 100644
> --- a/include/net/tls.h
> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
> @@ -282,9 +282,12 @@ struct tls_context {
> union tls_crypto_context crypto_send;
> union tls_crypto_context crypto_recv;
>
> - /* Registered for KeyUpdate, protected by the socket lock */
> + /* KeyUpdate state, protected by the socket lock */
> struct tls_traffic_secret tx_secret;
> struct tls_traffic_secret rx_secret;
> + u64 tx_key_updates; /* KeyUpdates sent */
> + bool tx_key_update_reply; /* peer set update_requested */
> + bool tx_key_update_asked; /* we set it, no answer yet */
>
> struct list_head list;
> refcount_t refcount;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tls.h b/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
> index d1b136ecea96..c85408cb6ce7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #define TLS_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN 5 /* Maximum plaintext size */
> #define TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET 6 /* TLS 1.3 TX traffic secret */
> #define TLS_RX_TRAFFIC_SECRET 7 /* TLS 1.3 RX traffic secret */
> +#define TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE 8 /* Send a TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate now */
>
> /* Supported versions */
> #define TLS_VERSION_MINOR(ver) ((ver) & 0xFF)
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
> index 63ece8074985..d12c9278c814 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls.h
> +++ b/net/tls/tls.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ int tls_hkdf_expand_label(const u8 *secret, size_t secret_len,
> const char *label, u8 *out, size_t out_len);
> int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx);
> int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +int tls_sw_key_update(struct sock *sk, int request);
> int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk, int tx,
> struct tls_crypto_info *new_crypto_info);
> void tls_update_rx_zc_capable(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> index 543bf57599c7..851d5b54b336 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> @@ -146,5 +146,10 @@ int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYOK);
>
> + /* Any KeyUpdate from the peer answers our update_requested */
> + ctx->tx_key_update_asked = false;
> + if (msg[4] == TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED)
> + ctx->tx_key_update_reply = true;
> +
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> index 8bb1b2773f3f..d71de99d8890 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> @@ -765,10 +765,14 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
> /* The registered secret no longer matches the key. The RX
> * secret also needs the TX one, see do_tls_setsockopt_secret().
> */
> - if (tx)
> + if (tx) {
> memzero_explicit(&ctx->tx_secret,
> sizeof(ctx->tx_secret));
> + ctx->tx_key_update_reply = false;
> + }
> memzero_explicit(&ctx->rx_secret, sizeof(ctx->rx_secret));
> + /* the answer now goes to user space */
> + ctx->tx_key_update_asked = false;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -987,6 +991,35 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_secret(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int do_tls_setsockopt_key_update(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
> + unsigned int optlen)
> +{
> + struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> + int value, rc;
> +
> + if (sockptr_is_null(optval) || optlen != sizeof(value))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_sockptr(&value, optval, sizeof(value)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (value != 0 && value != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rc = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ctx->tx_lock);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_SW)
> + rc = tls_sw_key_update(sk, value);
> + else
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + release_sock(sk);
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->tx_lock);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
> unsigned int optlen)
> {
> @@ -1020,6 +1053,9 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
> optname == TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET);
> release_sock(sk);
> break;
> + case TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE:
> + rc = do_tls_setsockopt_key_update(sk, optval, optlen);
> + break;
> default:
> rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> break;
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index cc0177320e7e..4fe78624859d 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/splice.h>
> +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
> #include <crypto/aead.h>
>
> #include <net/strparser.h>
> @@ -1005,6 +1006,151 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> return copied > 0 ? copied : ret;
> }
>
> +/* RFC 9846 section 5.5 allows 2^24.5 full-size records per AES-GCM key.
> + * Send the KeyUpdate a little earlier.
> + */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_TX_RECORDS BIT_ULL(24)
> +
> +/* Section 4.7.3: the epoch must not exceed 2^48-1. The application
> + * traffic secrets start at epoch 3.
> + */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_MAX (BIT_ULL(48) - 4)
> +
> +/* Send a KeyUpdate with the current key, then install the next key.
> + * Called with tx_lock held and the socket locked.
> + */
> +static int tls_tx_key_update(struct sock *sk, u8 request, int flags)
> +{
> + u8 body[TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE] = {
> + TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE, 0, 0, 1, request
> + };
> + struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> + struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
> + u8 record_type = TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE;
> + u8 buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(record_type))];
> + struct msghdr msg = {};
> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
> + struct kvec iov;
> + int ret;
> +
> + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> + msg.msg_control = buf;
> + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf);
> + msg.msg_flags = flags & (MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL);
> +
> + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
> + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_TLS;
> + cmsg->cmsg_type = TLS_SET_RECORD_TYPE;
> + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(record_type));
> + memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), &record_type, sizeof(record_type));
> +
> + iov.iov_base = body;
> + iov.iov_len = sizeof(body);
> + iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &iov, 1, sizeof(body));
> +
> + /* A control record closes the open record first, so all data
> + * written so far goes out with the current key, ahead of the
> + * KeyUpdate.
> + */
> + ret = tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, sizeof(body));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Nothing may be encrypted with the next key before the KeyUpdate
> + * is encrypted with the current one.
> + */
> + ret = tls_encrypt_async_wait(ctx);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = tls_keyupdate_rekey(sk, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* The peer expects the next key: the connection is lost */
> + TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSTXREKEYERROR);
> + tls_err_abort(sk, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSTXREKEYOK);
> + tls_ctx->tx_key_updates++;
> + if (request == TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED)
> + tls_ctx->tx_key_update_reply = false;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Send a KeyUpdate if one is due: in reply to the peer's
> + * update_requested (RFC 9846 section 4.7.3), or before the key reaches
> + * its record limit (section 5.5). ChaCha20-Poly1305 has no record limit:
> + * the sequence number would wrap first.
> + */
> +static int tls_tx_key_update_if_due(struct sock *sk, int flags)
'_if_due()' ? Hmm. 'tls_tx_should_update_key()'?
But otherwise looks good.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 13:52 [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/5] tls: add HKDF-Expand-Label for the TLS 1.3 key schedule Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/5] tls: add socket options to register the traffic secrets Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 17:13 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:23 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-10-28 17:18 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-28 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 5/5] selftests/tls: add KeyUpdate tests Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 14:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-28 14:21 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Chuck Lever
2026-10-28 14:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CAPG1HMsnUDa=Q5O4fwZOU=Pd+m7ahzu574Cs+mWoB_9KUT5ASA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-28 15:01 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-28 15:12 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-28 15:04 ` Martin Belanger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82963fe6-e908-4c1a-b963-ac1ab86f2bdc@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.belanger@dell.com \
--cc=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox