From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@openai.com>,
Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] mptcp: misc. features for v6.18
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:51:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834238b4-3549-4062-a29b-bf9c5aefa30f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902072600.2a9be439@kernel.org>
Hi Jakub,
On 02/09/2025 16:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 11:39:09 +0200 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
>> This series contains 4 independent new features:
>>
>> - Patch 1: use HMAC-SHA256 library instead of open-coded HMAC.
>>
>> - Patches 2-3: make ADD_ADDR retransmission timeout adaptive + simplify
>> selftests.
>>
>> - Patch 4: selftests: check for unexpected fallback counter increments.
>>
>> - Patches 5-6: record subflows in RPS table, for aRFS support.
>
> I don't see why, but kmemleak started to hit this with the join test
> 2 branches ago :\ Have you seen any kmemleak issues on your side?
> We also see occasional leaked skb in driver tests which makes no sense.
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff8880029d3340 (size 3016):
> comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4297316940
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 0a 00 01 02 0a 00 01 01 00 00 00 00 9e b8 7d 27 ..............}'
> 0a 00 07 41 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...A............
> backtrace (crc 3653d88c):
> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x284/0x330
> sk_prot_alloc.constprop.0+0x4e/0x1b0
> sk_clone_lock+0x4b/0x10d0
> mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x2e/0x10d0
> subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x9d1/0x1680
> tcp_check_req+0x3a4/0x1910
> tcp_v4_rcv+0x1004/0x30a0
> ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x82/0x350
> ip_local_deliver_finish+0x35d/0x620
> ip_local_deliver+0x19c/0x470
> ip_rcv+0xc2/0x370
> __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x108/0x180
> process_backlog+0x3c1/0x13e0
> __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x9f/0x460
> net_rx_action+0x54f/0xda0
> handle_softirqs+0x215/0x610
Thank you for this notification!
No, I didn't notice that on our side. For KMemLeak, now I'm waiting 5
seconds, then I force the scan, and check for issues once. On NIPA, I
see that there are still 2 scans + cat, and apparently, the issue was
always visible during the 2nd scan:
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-mptcp-dbg/results/279881/1-mptcp-join-sh/stdout
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-mptcp-dbg/results/280062/1-mptcp-join-sh/stdout
It is unclear why a second scan is needed and only the second one caught
something. Was it the same with the strange issues you mentioned in
driver tests? Do you think I should re-add the second scan + cat?
When looking at the modifications of this series, it is unclear what
could cause that.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 9:39 [PATCH net-next 0/6] mptcp: misc. features for v6.18 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] mptcp: use HMAC-SHA256 library instead of open-coded HMAC Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] mptcp: make ADD_ADDR retransmission timeout adaptive Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] selftests: mptcp: remove add_addr_timeout settings Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] selftests: mptcp: add checks for fallback counters Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: Add rfs_needed() helper Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-01 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] mptcp: record subflows in RPS table Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-09-02 14:26 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] mptcp: misc. features for v6.18 Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-02 14:51 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-09-02 15:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-02 18:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 18:50 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-02 21:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 21:38 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-02 22:21 ` Christoph Paasch
2025-09-02 14:29 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-02 19:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-02 19:25 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-02 20:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834238b4-3549-4062-a29b-bf9c5aefa30f@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cpaasch@openai.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=yangang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).