From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CFF4A0C; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775912931; cv=none; b=ik+GDisZoFEpgQvDdY9G/cxfZztLSRDoGrlk/8Yh8DRWdMQnqqtzNOR2+22DJizh7MOBTyiZwv+xbO1kfN6wZn8hPz3DYeNqaC3RcoFUSMYPI+q14/NXOVBOXLoFX8BwhYfmvU+7h63blbod+qyjJMofjBkbnFelAMWuOjWds38= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775912931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K6tulqhHSFwM3NLIubquX0sIAdwrVMLg5T0qmkgLIjA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hEqij3rWUrR8dX7kCIjurSMBG3w2lsnyQNLa2Qmb7d46GBKPTpLIupkI1rmCZySCqxpUUTOV9TPcG4LGnv5rnnrs8h3skFwBnAEAjTqp1BGrTS997XpRlk5Mpx/I5N+hGTw9PMhYWBmDUN3KiUoET9XVYabCFV8BNkc9Q9XsaK8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=RVAc8Elf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="RVAc8Elf" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F3C4741089 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1775912929; bh=K6tulqhHSFwM3NLIubquX0sIAdwrVMLg5T0qmkgLIjA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=RVAc8ElfgAaiVZbmqHcuSmTEVqOiy4ZcrF3Z/9QD8rZNlxNlhni4Pn/KQ0a9hf3bo aT1Og8Ny1+HA5u8dror7RVV3odiujtOckgy1tQVPk9W4D00btQROtkIaeoZuGiGVff vehL/JEM0u1s69NqcsvgoW56Yk4qPY6651mSXlsCXccUL1BCy489jEr6esd1ghR038 TWZ3pVsA/xjZTtBC2IN4OuKHq7AenkqpIv3fgjjQuMiUN8TAjo3VoZXb19dP6kME7n yR6s+z2NiiEgvybZaTiSveExgyLTGyhw59fMoa4OAwgjq8aNM7lySWYdtaEpR9l2cd 2wnDgZSUt77zg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3C4741089; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:08:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Aaron Tomlin , Christoph Hellwig , Frederic Weisbecker , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei , Valentin Schneider , Waiman Long , Peter Zijlstra , John Ogness Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Documentation: Add managed interrupts In-Reply-To: <87qzomzv8q.ffs@tglx> References: <20260401110232.ET5RxZfl@linutronix.de> <87wlygb3wd.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <87qzomzv8q.ffs@tglx> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:08:48 -0600 Message-ID: <871pgl1w67.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Thomas Gleixner writes: > On Thu, Apr 09 2026 at 08:32, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >>> This documents what we have as of today and how it works. I added some >>> examples how the parameter affects the configuration. Did I miss >>> something? >> >> There's been a lot of silence on this one... should I pick this one up, >> or are there other plans for it...? > > Looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner OK, I've applied it, thanks. jon