From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF703DD514; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775745035; cv=none; b=CuW+W2st758Tn77XBhBN0dJMGjh2iufUAMqRoAjPv+FGyTtcIvJdz2mTpNKySL2gOiIRyeekbbteRZFBPXQMPDyyeUR4fSc9GZnYIHmMMPV8CfF0Vxe77vPcE7GyqRFyhFr2zAZcCYKGsVLrhtCkEJX7xyrUC7oenjE/u2PHaBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775745035; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UgnyxP644wtYINxEjlNBjbqD0RcmoqQxseU3wqO5bqU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dz4ZLfQO31MgyRz9Y9TBgAfq9DEZYUcLLufs8YP2Pzn0wYiVOkPDJ5sCgwCFQ36qZmVgrVWiKXdHGzvtzx0xW6WasO2Nfj8bHcrj0LLUZ0duGzwaI4QL1IMKYbPOGjEoWHIkY9DZAcvcBd2ySA3OoCEf5yOSl+aFDXerJ7Ciosw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=UzI1M/XB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="UzI1M/XB" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 78F7640B2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1775745033; bh=qz+51zr09ryC6J49RGj7ncZ6Z1RXPexLABTUbLHqsk8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UzI1M/XB5QE0Ym2K4WGrA0WAqtwKxM4oFlLN67sg/VIC5neBRqD2gv7TnfZbZpJV3 C/kyBaJmwyYeZr/h1UsgR2l7M4SKOudvmZH7qgAFq1wqrJvyK69NpdQOUhEfcBc13f NWACRRaWULX00UhY/vcmlzFltUfDdD8zBZJcH2Py4JVu9ElXqClclRucPuOqw5pFhk lMVFLOFzIgjFSuT2F8TysGTLKIVYrkBYmpBie7EuyZYi1DYYVZynLcXDSNqdDA/nsT tekgjAe3UID+bt2ymw7m3qZJokg2wZJeZR5DyLkG9Wu7cQzi62lMopGNbnc2w2HMQb 6N1700kVETCzA== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78F7640B2D; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:30:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alexs@kernel.org, si.yanteng@linux.dev, dzm91@hust.edu.cn, carlos.bilbao@kernel.org, avadhut.naik@amd.com Cc: fangqiurong , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/doc: Update yield_task description in sched-design-CFS In-Reply-To: <20260403055806.358921-1-user@fqr-pc> References: <20260403055806.358921-1-user@fqr-pc> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:30:32 -0600 Message-ID: <871pgocik7.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain fqr writes: > From: fangqiurong > > The yield_task description referenced the long-removed compat_yield > sysctl and described the function as a dequeue/enqueue cycle. Update > it to reflect current behavior: yielding the CPU by moving the > current task's position back in the runqueue. > > Sync zh_CN and sp_SP translations. > > Signed-off-by: fangqiurong > --- > Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst | 5 ++--- > .../translations/sp_SP/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst | 6 +++--- > .../translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Also dropped the strange user.email address in your email; you will want to fix that before sending anything else. jon