From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2298E34C9A6; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 19:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774467621; cv=none; b=TX4Uy4HgFvOy71vKhSdF72L3qny9Cktbbu4kzMYePf8Z9L04tZQWWNgZ8xHNTe9DEXUVyJ5vBAjcDW7F4wNy+qg9NdxsyPtm4o6YOmUQLCXA1eu5/hKWg4pbztAO7czJe5vq/+Z8TbPzXoI2vvkAMB166VZ6UPP/3hAbDUyURjs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774467621; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9zX7UtGytQM7vMV1uL87V8xV2ol0NYGkhlfUJHvglKU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=laqMSwsDMxZK6Qh1WTISUGtAdChVPIwaVxuyGAf89XLahZq2bGsMl8qPwj23M+fJzmicKrnt/sLjk1kHhVYxP/t7qcRaXGaAIGBYgWdqXBW9U203KQQ/8g2YsHfHxWAyirZdJK5fd/UUtfqT5bFvAmCKqpF++HEP9lb1VJ+7wQQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Q4BPq+/R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Q4BPq+/R" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5CA4240C6F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774467619; bh=l3ZvicdM3Z/ujrHLRbQeTksh7B+HcLZrfxR2WZIahyo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Q4BPq+/RbCABlzx0Otv+ob9R63AyZ9CKp9MzvkkSj2UpaAK3xgqpCugDeyvCGoBPW cSRcQIjCz1Zj6qx+OJSRrThUEunkoHEq9ozi7O7fTxDHcP+obQMOQFxnUsnEYhp/ML agZ6JLwaVTkkIeX2cuBsIjxzkHssZHfQPcW2c2kKli37rUsRqgWs6mWCIkfcwk7RNp KsbFeNH3PucePTLFBeulFFO50mP1p8OWzGdWJjKARXBJmxbxHbkiETSVSQNv8iNZD3 oA23VVCoh/Bpy0ANXQfAH6Yon6ed/SrDALt74iMspXEkJBuOr0fNkOyShoDfHUDKYZ cO4UEsS0JDGTA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CA4240C6F; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 19:40:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov , Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] More kernel-doc unit tests In-Reply-To: <874im3g0w6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> References: <874im3g0w6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:40:18 -0600 Message-ID: <871ph7g0kd.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jonathan Corbet writes: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > >> Hi Jon, >> >> This series comes after >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20260318104321.53065c27@foz.lan/T/#t >> >> and contains the remaining patches I have ready to be merged. >> >> Its focus is primarly on adding unit tests for some corner >> cases. Several of such tests came from Randy, and were already >> previously submitted on some old series. >> >> I added a couple of extra tests there to check if tables and code >> blocks will be properly producing rst and man content. >> >> Due to such test, I ended discovering one bug, fixed on the last >> patch on this series. >> >> On this series, the actual tests are not part of the unit test >> source code. Instead, they're loaded from an yaml file that >> uses a properly defined schema. One of the tests check if the >> file follows such schema. > > I've applied these, thanks. Actually nevermind...it appears that this series was superseded by the set sent on Monday? I've applied the newer set instead. Thanks, jon