From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Document alternative for referring upstream commit hash
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:54:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735e5a864.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809045543.2049293-1-carnil@debian.org>
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> writes:
> Additionally to the "commit <sha1> upstream." variant, "[ Upstream
> commit <sha1> ]" is used as well as alternative to refer to the upstream
> commit hash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> ---
> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
So this is a nit but...
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> index c61865e91f52..2fd8aa593a28 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ text, like this:
>
> commit <sha1> upstream.
>
> +or alternatively:
> +
> +.. code-block:: none
> +
> + [ Upstream commit <sha1> ]
Can this just be:
or alternatively::
[ Upstream commit <sha1> ]
That extra RST markup just clutters things without any advantage.
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 4:55 [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Document alternative for referring upstream commit hash Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-08-09 8:30 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-08-09 8:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-09 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2022-08-09 13:37 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-08-26 8:27 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-09-01 15:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-01 18:45 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735e5a864.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).