From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED6A234964; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 19:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774467195; cv=none; b=rlBOuFee7GZFLAH85ncnwCL+wT600ZjKVOVcsnPgKK2o5NL2rl2SpBYfcOwg3fWubPDRxkef33n4b60UBDWWp6Jl/IecHAKBvmdQptWXHESrhc/atIC0G8Gu010qRnaQ2nlmsVr0Yfkpmuw/msZZK+J+ZMHgmA+hEUcn78TRtU8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774467195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sZggBEhesX3W/rJRhqRA3mSKFQktBAvrUIwXGli50Yw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UOEqFhLgfcUp861ZgYtdnhrP3Przj/jSavHyUXLJ5C5Iw28o2lsYQ7PxToP/fuSxo1s63zC4mYgBuauVgMP5cCOFsghI4w3J8lKwoP0dOuLFmI7wxoeLKSGgVVKTRlA3pvLl7lEEeE42csyUVKjwYlZTtLOV3E/Cx/kOeisOi7M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=ElXqQXbc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="ElXqQXbc" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3D9E840C6F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774467194; bh=TheRULhZ85skRQP6hmmE0EveQG0qqiDhsUyL70rwqE0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ElXqQXbcPkGgm4+kQfwCTQBNcR2+g1axRxQwREpE087OhrfoYRK52r/mkvMzmWSfZ RuX1Tq4kUuvBPEAReHNZlkZro8H6AFW95IeDsnUSuFXMss1H6ENv/fqxCHycRrCQtT B06ZmhBnegorwJrO0q4Ut08FCf2bGjg66iT+HMY8NxK5wIe0X60CEn3DMp0MPpxIXK KJN+bVWFKtObHvXikjOnW5oaFvXZAcEbqhP5DY7JKYdya1ilPGFLVh3AhNGlHsvuF2 +ud+3Rk4TwQupvKHv7jKWRU9EZazfKzQGXLMqGgAB3lUGyZQEtbduKlmtPvC2yYaJG CclEws39o/4cA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D9E840C6F; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 19:33:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov , Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] More kernel-doc unit tests In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:33:13 -0600 Message-ID: <874im3g0w6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series comes after > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20260318104321.53065c27@foz.lan/T/#t > > and contains the remaining patches I have ready to be merged. > > Its focus is primarly on adding unit tests for some corner > cases. Several of such tests came from Randy, and were already > previously submitted on some old series. > > I added a couple of extra tests there to check if tables and code > blocks will be properly producing rst and man content. > > Due to such test, I ended discovering one bug, fixed on the last > patch on this series. > > On this series, the actual tests are not part of the unit test > source code. Instead, they're loaded from an yaml file that > uses a properly defined schema. One of the tests check if the > file follows such schema. I've applied these, thanks. jon