From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76753E3C5D; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773759959; cv=none; b=fe3WFFrS/YilEAZFhxI6Glnwu/efdlcivUczawJA0EOo+cSyj9xxDZLRxCDB+hNCPPTIYNQa+gJE+IKPME8XsM9S+dt5X3onxewBEkefYbfvkZaHp1iRtQPIR547rBS5dZ6gSJBzomtcbbukpaZyXCl9yu/w+UkiT2pLfvHKZF8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773759959; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MX3WCxaiQASDTLsC5NMpwSqJSWncFo8CQIqLXa1xBBs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ms8CMSS1IIWfAxFQ93XpphH+PSsqdEAeYM/H/3+tiWi4G/ksYf6rYCV0slNr3DyDS7xG9GK/xbtb3WxO8qhdECzgfNwKR7Udum3QZhASwwoi8u1VjxcMdEKc1y/GMa+DQ8tF9G11ow7KF8ZNpH6QmT1KPBv3JYxRLxQclvIkYmQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=ETdCAe3Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="ETdCAe3Y" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3ACAC40C7C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773759958; bh=MX3WCxaiQASDTLsC5NMpwSqJSWncFo8CQIqLXa1xBBs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ETdCAe3YHmGKwtQaLgQmW4vvr1BGvgYX3GD9dHDozwKTddhpkPyMYrp0PRR9r44hl KK7eD2X3wTh8XajiEh3Q9zKvsfQ6X3ppbK2+G9R9tAhmzzV5cklujCYJNtsh6noKWI 4x1VdmDqIz8yBKjNi8z7t9yFXO8zmHr3GsTe+T82TPbv/cMhpHyfJIiARkIHBjy7WM sK/+gxUp1psm82v7m8UUkBWS3pTAwc0hBGeT4rJTYeA+oiVENH1AMjmVtFiOpszVoX mT0GTtvpzskpnAZsO/cF1qAhz9I3rETR4Ztlt2F/3WFm7Tjr0jzzK42kSnChUw/tF1 CBXhnq/iOPh1Q== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ACAC40C7C; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:05:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Manuel Ebner , Collin Funk , Shuah Khan Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manuel Ebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] workflow: process/changes.rst: sort list In-Reply-To: <20260312002607.191358-2-manuelebner@airmail.cc> References: <20260311164935.183495-3-manuelebner@airmail.cc> <20260312002607.191358-2-manuelebner@airmail.cc> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:05:57 -0600 Message-ID: <874imecx7u.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Manuel Ebner writes: > It is a pain in the ass to compare the software versions on the running > system (scripts/ver_linux) with the minimal required versions. > Sorting both lists the same way makes side-by-side comparisons a simple task. > > sort output alphabetically Need I say that providing identical changelogs for two different patches is a sign that something isn't quite right? The change itself looks fine. Thanks, jon