Re: [PATCH] Documentation: insist on the plain-text requirement for security reports

[Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>]

Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 03:17:41PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> As the trend of AI-generated reports is growing, the trend of unreadable
>> reports in gimmicky formats is following, and we cannot request that
>> developers rely on online viewers to be able to read a security report
>> full for formatting tags. Let's just insist on the plain text requirement
>> a bit more.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Looks good to me!  Given the number of non-plain-text emails with binary
> attachments we still get there, it's obvious not many people seem to
> read this file, but it can't hurt!  :)
>
> I'll queue this up if Jon doesn't, after -rc1 is out.  If he wants to
> take it, here's my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

I grabbed it, thanks.

jon