From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D30D371049 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 12:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778501678; cv=none; b=AOZm9pUVkg7XzMLXRbqwGZacXPw3QISKuDa+je0h7AVe+jLQwVK14ekG6htm2Z//tbwS1x8aUC/HrFUGX+DFvs9ApilKpVBWynWUMyHfFbKB5t1Qn8Yx/HFLWrWKS/64YFKCIbyQGlRauGlyIoXEVwHisx341HuC+s2ZUD13a3w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778501678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pb7ALZUZXOQlcKiG6O7I7STmbleVFJX3QQzMnVbbQI8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Qut6X0Gacj7u4799UFmMUW27ebngXcrMdDNzQ8zXIfQ6cT0yHE0XsJ8e3cpVLZI7rhoyqmlyUHWlycGLIS+otKTN2ljAU0RHjU1sQ/QBvOz0s2gZP7Nj18NDVNG5wJSU+DoCJKnwQR17Cm2ldAZklIoeYsC1Wa9tiT6a4A6cCSw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Io79iC5+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Io79iC5+" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 6C0F5410B5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1778501676; bh=04eLlvx/pZh/pgfhzlxjTsKybP+rISrltG/8U1AFLoI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Io79iC5+6DYLG4ji1PeaYkSLp3UayBLYIPW+N9+bquywMCfki2JFHiG8eXDoorJDh dEGcUkNrP74zz2mqmGWrPpUQjplN/xWftgHso71cF7m/6JIcbjSQdzbFJsLr+Dxqj7 dqnJ3C89cqsFxC1xUQbqnv8aX12wJi9xWbXwIyDmiBzrkPRbORgc0pcDNBoJCXbyM4 eioui6Ye17h6u9AJiIA+wUz9jrBK4XgtqScYk6O8EmSEX/hPVANF0BF+tB/sY2xXTp isYim1HfifeBm9HIXZ2WOFRWb1irDApKap3dW2TWcyVakVDWJYgFRwpXpfWZhcuodX L4ljznhdkoAmQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C0F5410B5; Mon, 11 May 2026 12:14:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jani Nikula , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Maarten Lankhorst Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Documentation/gpu: tables of contents cleanups and fixes In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 06:14:35 -0600 Message-ID: <875x4uw3bo.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jani Nikula writes: > On Fri, 08 May 2026, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Make the GPU documentation slightly easier to navigate. > > Maxime, Thomas, Maarten, Jon - > > Any preferences which tree to merge this through? I'm thinking either > drm-misc-next or docs-next. Usually I stand back from DRM docs, expecting them to go through the DRM tree. I can certainly pick up this set if that's best, but I wasn't expecting to. Thanks, jon