Re: [PATCH v2] docs: pt_BR: translate process/1.Intro.rst

[Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>]

Daniel Pereira <danielmaraboo@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 11:02 AM Daniel Castro <arantescastro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> Thank you for sending the new version. Please review the following
> crucial points before submitting v3:
>
> New Email for Each Version: Always send patches in a new email,
> including the version number in the subject (e.g., [PATCH v3] docs:
> pt_BR: translate process/1.Intro.rst). This is vital for community
> tracking.

Daniel did mark v2 correctly.  A new version definitely should be sent
as the start of a new thread, though, rather than as a reply to the
previous.

> Subheading Formatting: The misalignment in the subheading separators
> persists (e.g., +Créditos/+--------). Please correct this.

Looking at the patch:

> +
> +Créditos
> +--------
> +
> 

...I don't see the problem you are describing here?

And again, please put comments like that inline, as I am doing here;
that makes it far easier for everybody to follow what's going on.

> Use checkpatch.pl: Always run the checkpatch.pl tool before
> submitting. This is mandatory and will catch these style errors,
> helping to prevent rejections.

Good advice, but checkpatch doesn't emit any actionable suggestions for
this patch...?

All told, I don't see a reason not to apply this version, is there
something I'm missing?

Thanks,

jon