From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E1A3ED5A7; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773073739; cv=none; b=C9atK6q2Z/kJPV0eAMOgKy9z+bhv4Cf4adiCWkdhxh+Rwh52Xm3ylQZe3DTryBPhO53lFo1tTLSkjK0Abo7dbBTMI2P6AeXuRpSLgNVHTKeBuUPxjQju+rgZkM9m1Bs664MDmjfsgBafOhtcRQUa4lC3xaBOMs1gqePEjCFoYUI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773073739; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pn5X4Ny4OKqk2R0pS7tVfiWl7D3huVd/WFbOd1d2IW8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BkHQtLmaL/6SShM8dAi4PU41IWocFr6JFXqOFjzapArrfViTN5bcU2xWrf3xQsrZ/ep9QamAV6yi5U8ryOHQ0qL54weo4VnvQ54xRt2q5LHdiwjFpVE5ST5Mrcs/xdEfSYxDJ3Qu0ieSb3EF5ZeM4oAmQ2PaaFf+Eh+F05Gw4ic= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=SSV7GFBb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="SSV7GFBb" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net EC28340C9C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773073736; bh=v0qDOsG3JjNHJH3g3fpgFiBY5vnzgOJjejQZIoTkzG0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SSV7GFBblh0IJ+9ttdSyLDR+eYuwsG2Ouk2FF7N+BRNY7gEN5MSGH8r0AH83F1eRU Gabdk0qcoMKdQOKeXTeNqmDD/7BSc7fqu7fp9reqnX1n7NvAUyngUBYeqw5+0eHg4o OOCjVSadIAtLAVZq67xepHMPbaJkPkluCjpTxkSkgMYQH1kmwJMie6X/tNALYnD3FA yIoMWgzuEmHiyVWyr4Rr3R1t5r8fizmkoMIzCrMG+iee8IsLipVhmhJBUCGQ5h8QeJ mRMhgG51hwoMICOCWy2nnNjou/qDe3R5+eG3gSEnnrH5WEx7FIsQCzNjMZKQx50QuT 1ldk9uwLQ5HZg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC28340C9C; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:28:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Better handle xform class In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 10:28:55 -0600 Message-ID: <875x75vuew.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > Those two patches are meant to help re-using kernel-doc outside > Linux Kernel. Currently, QEMU uses it, but it requires a different > transforms table. The first patch adds support to overriding it > there; The second one documents its ABI. > > - > > I'm picking those two patches from the past series. Those were > merged together with man fixes, but they're unrelated. > > So, let's place them in separate. > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2): > docs: kdoc_files: allows the caller to use a different xforms class > docs: kdoc_files: document KernelFiles() ABI > > tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_files.py | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon