From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EEE3985A for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705914828; cv=none; b=RrIN2m0w9B78H+1EwpSuI32OIuXebGIHa/UkFpJSKMNyEvI97qUpNtqa4AsmictduXO18xTTrTjt2OAFtlh949oipolDhSC/EAwsmBTf3RJYxJeLfeBAw3tx8ci+02xmAwUJC73vRCPunXgVQPKdQb4Cz7nBdWqF7XofCjLHpk0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705914828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Muw/ACCv40YRXAtPheo4rhlX6lZbF3TpLGVe8sZ0xFw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gatL3UZizLxWVQ8qbUrpKpHkna0gpiFjq4LEhLxDEt5dsh3obVU+LPowcgVJni7fsl8D3cpJH6apRWcuzgl73fTW5m69+A0g+KNcckapsy4K2WnsO8bSXwcA3d7LeaH1hsHWVHpN9bm3vi3JyzD0wFSRU9/M1lnbm9a4PGo8Lgs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=KlFjXxtK; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=3iWzB/qB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="KlFjXxtK"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="3iWzB/qB" From: Anna-Maria Behnsen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1705914824; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9bJXPsJFvgUAe10RlMHM/1lq6TXeHN4Z+QzN2R9x8u4=; b=KlFjXxtKXc/yYQ3JnkRQDYqTYVG+0Y3TUWB9nLigc8B3Sms6o3Pn688JaBnQgJrYcATedh vJ95+znvSJooPebwlT/KfxJZ+ewUQpXsC7RLR8bvkf5ymwcRoZep5T0sTDUANkDy3ve9xN NrbgAU3+6RSpuGO/9HLp17ZuZcfn+8PT1iAp3UtSOH0XcKUt6ZSfgxuqllGDrvZ1W0GqkX MBbUHteE+PSNcxA7QJAZ5KzBY5Gd/SlxWLruFf4kPJyews5dZlmU0BgxdTXD6Aj6Y8Z8XK DvKbNH5f7voYanagA22rxYEsyU/ixkVmWMOVF7YE7sRuK1L/4zfwTiB9Y+103A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1705914824; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9bJXPsJFvgUAe10RlMHM/1lq6TXeHN4Z+QzN2R9x8u4=; b=3iWzB/qBo36Q1D8j1qacC2COwiF9ycupFeWSqRx8XeaoKYe0PGyfBqFaQQx4ZdONjQ7Z7U 9BXeO9xDf4EE+TBw== To: Jani Nikula , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Jonathan Corbet , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/vram-helper: Fix 'multi-line' kernel-doc comments In-Reply-To: <87frywqrbc.fsf@intel.com> References: <20240116151456.48238-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de> <20240116151456.48238-2-anna-maria@linutronix.de> <87frywqrbc.fsf@intel.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:13:43 +0100 Message-ID: <875xzlzq60.fsf@somnus> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jani Nikula writes: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote: >> Reformat lines in kernel-doc comments, which make use of the backslash at >> the end to suggest it is a multi-line comment. kernel-doc is able to >> process e.g. the short description of a function properly, even if it is >> across two lines. >> >> No functional change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen > > Should be sent to dri-devel. > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Thanks for the review. As it was a RFC and would only work if the doc people are fine with the change, I decided not to bother all people in advance. I'll resend it without RFC also to dri-devel. Thanks, Anna-Maria