From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9984A175A8F for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773259751; cv=none; b=aUIgVNUW1vlzWOyTtuc6rdnFSvo6NsnTTZNvwOHDTkH71axgwj4pcIIpF1KrjAomcGdXMm7wb1+eLELY+rW2XOZ1BT/pJl4I67aDqAZY1c+6b4dHh6/8Awsz2V+vuD5EwKsE0EnydfLHEtBOA58jhHdb7KDcgoJe0Z9Q/Tv9XDk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773259751; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DXMyQFYVMHR4gmLxYapEorfWW2CBwmkTt6ZsDv+rC5c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZGiRD8MzN/t+OQJpcoe4FxbiVodnMp28QL9IPPDyLb4jeOYqxho7OWfB2L0luh8LuoePaPkxUI2jg8R1cSD/kMdHrg7Em45fEQzMZhZyxxQQkEuNjVgQqwKW4+9yYkhV8SKLszt47Q/zim5Lg0YQdoWM0Jxu/FVgiWR4QCCnEio= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=sDvQCBLr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="sDvQCBLr" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BD0EC40C63 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773259749; bh=LhWDr1diLJa3inCbjRKMzkGrs5MlHrcPE68LzyJUGao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=sDvQCBLrnvzQoGccDXbu3//xLuSQkj/svBWcXfq1Cj+UwEtdaO3GDeZhS7rtIFw4D iHauGsYAw13L66vCdZSJmkANSJY/nsUW9xodm0wNlUDfV6VfBQyvHQ61M5zOQEXjy+ GrBJWQPqBlxjHBLM2nJYnkSxikjrsbbkd7WhM1blZzJiZNPI4/MQa8+q8OaKtVmPHM vIIcAxLT/dpY+axpuieDamePkYt2VAzHIj1kxaelFlAxPrK/TW1iEoZarL+M5YY2kH BWixlllzrZXfIMAmyhuo5WKdRayLYz2TF0qgIG9SQJiGQm9E9nLHmCIC5jJe+7Ac/6 QpoAq5aKrLpEw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD0EC40C63; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:09:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH docs-next v2] docs: pt_BR: add netdev and maintainer handbook translations In-Reply-To: References: <20260309030411.88945-1-danielmaraboo@gmail.com> <874impxab2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:09:08 -0600 Message-ID: <877briqgbf.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Daniel Pereira writes: > I'm preparing v3. I've ensured a final newline in > Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst to > address your previous comment. > > However, during local testing of v3, I received a warning about a "new > blank line at EOF" on one of the files. Could you please confirm if I > should ensure the correct single final newline is present in both > maintainer-handbooks.rst and the new file, maintainer-netdev.rst? I've > also tried to address the "strange line breaks" in the latter. > > I have a version of v3 ready to send if the newline fix is only > required for maintainer-handbooks.rst. Go ahead and send v3. The others are worth fixing when you get a chance, but that can be a separate patch. Thanks, jon