From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302F111CA9 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759501568; cv=none; b=u4GFRAPdeQ6NhftiQc6bpghYDXvj0Fx3G1rROdYCAkPhITKtJkSmfLSgQYjoGpd0T01yov4ffbmj5iTAYSFOJLFMnABGtevUZntnLMAGi+jv7JbI7rXvXT4KX7u9LpykM6u1nTYVnHz9T7hZADPj6dLFExOaVvpZYr9SeTPZ/AE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759501568; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F2UvfxoQOzCnEuV3gA9j70rbCAmuwqvMYfQ1kpolsgo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SQRvmiWWOJBqphh/PGAuFe1+rJz8xZaz6y1xOQ7UK4d5Aem/TEWxU62moLUnXgY1PzVkmCJNd9l3kSpGMZGf5PUTBMSMQdz52lamkklZORO8PmWFx0ooi1+cWWgtXMNZo+Te9pQtii3xK17y9Q7YTZmssPHxk08Az4ncI6WVBSA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=QloeOuB4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="QloeOuB4" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3FD48406FA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1759501564; bh=dr8l1J90GVv9nmM6s7NkdNN0PsFQe3x4xl6oPqmqvvs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QloeOuB4ZlH7P95VRqKX5nSu1wmKPfwficrDvGd87FyGMBs1mHNvhe2r3lcc3WEvf +lNSmabJPaK3P+BkY642EgCb1d6qPe45g2B+ZTuKYXbT1fEPWz3O4NpIrNQoxCJW/H fRWoDU5rt1kJ2aISHl0oKlOwdAIVi4vg6cZAVR+XwtodoL9TACcpXwsqJU+Gds+868 +fca7YrhOeYNpMJG1dO+WBSQAIgmnGy/xBkQv1lvAm/cUzv00UOluY5PUXYASPYT78 orxHys+NZW/rg1zSfAtYrqpU+oS9qcQnn9s1gIKfl59kvTSEkbetehmvOCIRKa7V6O jkslVE50lw7Wg== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FD48406FA; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:26:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Matthew Wilcox , Mr Tourist Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: reorganize kernel documentation overview for clarity In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:25:59 -0600 Message-ID: <878qhsrrig.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Matthew Wilcox writes: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 09:46:26AM +0530, Mr Tourist wrote: >> Thanks for the review and comments provided Matthew and Randy, >> >> I have addressed the comments shared and have attached the updated patch >> over the email. > > No, send the patch inline. > > Also generate the patch relative to what is currently in the tree, > not relative to the last patch you sent. ...also, copying the documentation maintainer would be a good thing to do... Thanks, jon