From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966DF1A2562; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719509613; cv=none; b=otTD8Vv+aCVkOdFqHpnQwBoCHTNhTIVEHIfI2AAh2FCQZuo82qo8ARHM2TuBYGyKR6LVbL4fiG8WVS8wtUhWnGHfuHfH7f3lwrwguzDljuHvDLu2WXjbeaGdNnF2kWEFnLT6lti/MRAC0s4+yJS76rewb1JldTA+OWIVd0wM23s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719509613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/JDFP9n6PGo01QXfypchoElbcwXuKjpkCu1BCM+9qoI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EVBE1rJvF9HvPAtGcvlcJ3d8RdzsD9eRzvfeSnLQtCeTODJn5cjspZ1YjKn0+RYhICn0kvHA+SusCCgL6CEDQJ51jUfbgq5PIevSzD0inEEb9w5yvUQeya0LP+v/jKMalJP0pGdRmpMLlFiFTnFGEZXOkaCkMkFcKhSRlfHvGfw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=tTiorXtG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="tTiorXtG" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F05BD45E04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1719509603; bh=/F0zoivBxY/yAFf6EizQZgWTamhqaIwwJLXJPsffNqw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=tTiorXtGomA4x7G2OjLDGPpYeHkdD4jyTMsnz9pXdnT/u4wPtCLB/Lk828aZkEOVB wxSKf5UGbSovb/OXApOzV+a34NsDkKJZXnbaU3htbEz9/nYT2cnc3PdwdRqPvZLkJB T4b4W1ExvU/Q7/sg/yEpAYCTTRkaEa6oSH5Z9avN7kPynPPu7GJjte+MG9yCrlyqLt IoZHU4DxBTcUMvtsVCaQa8qXIL1IhZsNQ1snnRaH5OP+Z3NgZa2+mns7ApkD1aezg9 z5GvpW+1bkVdemNuMqwzmK0DFHRJzlmCDxmMn7xUrzMiQDVUbzhPixcejXEaMXIv2X VgMmUhHa0LjYw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F05BD45E04; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:33:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Thomas Huth , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Remove IA-64 from kernel-parameters In-Reply-To: <20240627162458.387700-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20240627162458.387700-1-thuth@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:33:22 -0600 Message-ID: <878qyqwasd.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Thomas Huth writes: > IA-64 has been removed from the tree, so we should also remove > the corresponding kernel-parameters documentation now. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > Note: Patch is based on linux-next branch (which already contains > some other patches to kernel-parameters.txt) That can make it hard for maintainers to apply; it's better to base patches on the tree you are targeting. > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 1 - > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 45 ++----------------- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) Nonetheless it applied just fine to docs-next, so I have done so, thanks. jon